Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that student-teacher ratios in government-funded schools not exceed a certain limit. All Vargonian...

GMAT Critical Reasoning : (CR) Questions

Source: Official Guide

Critical Reasoning

Evaluate

MEDIUM

...

Notes

Post a Query

Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that student-teacher ratios in government-funded schools not exceed a certain limit. All Vargonian children are entitled to education, free of charge, in these schools. When a recession occurs and average incomes fall, the number of children enrolled in government-funded schools tends to increase. Therefore, though most employment opportunities contract in economic recessions, getting a teaching job in Vargonia's government-funded schools will not be made more difficult by a recession.

Which of the following would be most important to determine in order to evaluate the argument?

Whether in Vargonia there are any schools not funded by the government that offer children an education free of charge

Whether the number of qualified applicants for teaching positions in government-funded schools increases significantly during economic recessions

What the current student-teacher ratio in Vargonia's government-funded schools is

What proportion of Vargonia's workers currently hold jobs as teachers in government-funded schools

Whether in the past a number of government funded schools in Vargonia have had student teacher ratios well in excess of the new limit

Solution

Passage Analysis:

Text from Passage	Analysis
Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that student-teacher ratios in government-funded schools not exceed a certain limit.	What it says: Vargonia now has a law that caps how many students each teacher can have in public schools What it does: Sets up the legal framework that will be important for the argument What it is: Author's background information Visualization: If limit is \(25:1\), then 1 teacher can handle max 25 students
All Vargonian children are entitled to education, free of charge, in these schools.	What it says: Every kid in Vargonia can go to these public schools for free What it does: Explains why enrollment numbers could change - there's a free alternative available What it is: Author's background information
When a recession occurs and average incomes fall, the number of children enrolled in government-funded schools tends to increase.	What it says: During economic downturns, more kids end up in public schools What it does: Connects economic conditions to school enrollment, building toward the main argument What it is: Author's claimed pattern Visualization: Normal times: 1000 kids in public schools → Recession: 1400 kids in public schools
Therefore, though most employment opportunities contract in economic recessions, getting a teaching job in Vargonia's government-funded schools will not be made more difficult by a recession.	What it says: Even though recessions usually make jobs harder to find, teaching jobs in public schools won't get harder to get What it does: Presents the main conclusion by combining all the previous facts What it is: Author's main conclusion Visualization: Recession impact: Most jobs ↓ but Teaching jobs → same difficulty level

Argument Flow:

The argument starts by establishing that Vargonia has student-teacher ratio limits and free public education. It then shows that recessions drive more students to public schools. Finally, it concludes that this increased enrollment means teaching jobs won't get harder to find during recessions, even though other jobs do.

Main Conclusion:

Getting a teaching job in Vargonia's government-funded schools will not become more difficult during a recession.

Logical Structure:

The argument assumes that more students enrolling (due to recession) plus ratio limits equals more teaching positions needed. But we don't know if the government will actually hire more teachers or fund new positions during a recession - they might just ignore the ratio limits or change the law.

Prethinking:

Question type:

Evaluate - We need to find what information would be most crucial to determine whether the argument's conclusion is valid or not

Precision of Claims

The argument makes specific claims about student-teacher ratio limits, enrollment increases during recessions, and concludes that teaching job difficulty won't increase during recessions

Strategy

For evaluate questions, we need to think of assumptions the argument makes and create scenarios that would either strengthen or weaken the conclusion when taken to extremes. The key is finding what missing information could make or break this argument about teaching job availability during recessions

Answer Choices Explained

Whether in Vargonia there are any schools not funded by the government that offer children an education free of charge

This asks about other free schools not funded by the government. While this might affect enrollment patterns slightly, it doesn't address the core logic gap about whether teaching positions will actually become easier or harder to get during recessions. The argument is specifically about government-funded schools, and knowing about other free alternatives doesn't help us evaluate whether teaching job difficulty changes during economic downturns.

Whether the number of qualified applicants for teaching positions in government-funded schools increases significantly during economic recessions

This directly targets the crucial missing piece of the argument. The argument assumes that increased enrollment will make teaching jobs more available, but if the number of qualified teacher applicants also surges during recessions (perhaps because other job opportunities dry up), then competition for teaching positions could actually intensify significantly. This information would be essential to determine whether the conclusion holds - if applicants increase much more than positions, teaching jobs could become harder, not easier, to get.

What the current student-teacher ratio in Vargonia's government-funded schools is

Knowing the current student-teacher ratio tells us about the present situation but doesn't help evaluate what will happen during a recession. Whether schools currently operate at, below, or above the new limit doesn't address the dynamic relationship between enrollment increases and job availability during economic downturns.

What proportion of Vargonia's workers currently hold jobs as teachers in government-funded schools

The proportion of workers currently in teaching jobs gives us a snapshot of the current employment landscape but doesn't help us evaluate what happens to teaching job difficulty during recessions. This is static information that doesn't address the argument's claims about changing conditions during economic downturns.

Whether in the past a number of government funded schools in Vargonia have had student teacher ratios well in excess of the new limit

Historical information about schools exceeding previous limits might be interesting background, but it doesn't help evaluate the future scenario described in the argument. Past ratio violations don't tell us about the relationship between recession-driven enrollment increases and teaching job availability under the new legal requirements.

Rate this Solution

Tell us what you think about this solution

...

Forum Discussions

Start a new discussion

Post

Previous Attempts

Loading attempts...