e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

One of the limiting factors in human physical performance is the amount of oxygen that is absorbed by the muscles...

GMAT Critical Reasoning : (CR) Questions

Source: Official Guide
Critical Reasoning
Boldface
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

One of the limiting factors in human physical performance is the amount of oxygen that is absorbed by the muscles from the bloodstream. Accordingly, entrepreneurs have begun selling at gymnasiums and health clubs bottles of drinking water, labeled "SuperOXY," that has extra oxygen dissolved in the water. Such water would be useless in improving physical performance, however, since the only way to get oxygen into the bloodstream so that it can be absorbed by the muscles is through the lungs.

Which of the following, if true, would serve the same function in the argument as the statement in boldface?

A
the water lost in exercising can be replaced with ordinary tap water
B
the amount of oxygen in the blood of people who are exercising is already more than the muscle can absorb
C
world-class athletes turn in record performance without such water
D
frequent physical exercise increases the body's ability to take in and use oxygen
E
lack of oxygen is not the only factor limiting human physical performance
Solution

Understanding the Passage

Text from Passage Analysis
"One of the limiting factors in human physical performance is the amount of oxygen that is absorbed by the muscles from the bloodstream."
  • What it says: Human athletic performance is limited by how much oxygen muscles can get from blood flowing through the body.
  • Visualization: Current limitation: Muscles receive 20ml oxygen per 100ml blood → Performance capped at 85% potential. If muscles could receive 25ml oxygen per 100ml blood → Performance could reach 95% potential.
  • What it does: Establishes the scientific foundation for understanding physical performance - oxygen delivery is a key bottleneck.
  • Source: Author's factual statement
"Accordingly, entrepreneurs have begun selling at gymnasiums and health clubs bottles of drinking water, labeled 'SuperOXY,' that has extra oxygen dissolved in the water."
  • What it says: Business people saw this oxygen limitation as an opportunity and started selling special water with extra oxygen added to it at fitness centers.
  • Visualization: Regular water: 8mg oxygen per liter → SuperOXY water: 35mg oxygen per liter. Gyms selling bottles for $4 each to athletes wanting better performance.
  • What it does: Introduces the business response to the oxygen limitation problem - a proposed solution through oxygenated water.
  • Source: Author reporting factual market development
"Such water would be useless in improving physical performance, however,"
  • What it says: The author states that this oxygenated water will not actually help athletes perform better.
  • Visualization: Athletes drinking SuperOXY water: Expected performance boost 0% → Actual performance boost 0%. Money spent: $4 per bottle → Benefit received: $0 value.
  • What it does: Presents the author's main conclusion - rejecting the effectiveness of the marketed solution.
  • Source: Author's conclusion
(Boldface 1) "since the only way to get oxygen into the bloodstream so that it can be absorbed by the muscles is through the lungs"
  • What it says: Oxygen can only enter the bloodstream (where muscles can access it) by being breathed into the lungs - there is no other pathway.
  • Visualization: Pathway 1 (lungs): Air with 21% oxygen → Lungs → Bloodstream → Muscles (100% effective). Pathway 2 (drinking): Oxygenated water → Stomach → Bloodstream → Muscles (0% effective - oxygen cannot transfer from digestive system).
  • What it does: Provides the scientific reasoning that supports why the oxygenated water cannot work.
  • Source: Author's reasoning/evidence

Overall Structure

The author presents a scientific fact about oxygen limitation, describes a market response to this limitation, then refutes the effectiveness of that response using biological reasoning. The logic flows: problem identification → proposed solution → rejection of solution with supporting evidence.

Main Conclusion: SuperOXY water would be useless in improving physical performance.

Boldface Segments

  • Boldface 1: the only way to get oxygen into the bloodstream so that it can be absorbed by the muscles is through the lungs

Boldface Understanding

Boldface 1:

  • Function: This serves as the scientific evidence/reasoning that explains why the author's conclusion is correct
  • Direction: Supports the author's conclusion (same direction) - it provides the biological basis for rejecting the effectiveness of oxygenated water

Structural Classification

Boldface 1:

  • Structural Role: Supporting evidence/premise that justifies the main conclusion
  • Predicted Answer Patterns: "evidence supporting the conclusion," "reason for the author's position," "premise that supports the main claim"
Answer Choices Explained
A
the water lost in exercising can be replaced with ordinary tap water

This statement about replacing water lost during exercise with ordinary tap water doesn't serve the same function as the boldface. The boldface explains WHY SuperOXY water can't work (oxygen pathway limitation), while this choice just mentions hydration replacement without addressing the oxygen delivery mechanism that's central to the argument.

B
the amount of oxygen in the blood of people who are exercising is already more than the muscle can absorb

CORRECT - This serves the same function as the boldface statement. Both provide scientific reasoning for why SuperOXY water would be useless. The boldface argues that oxygen can't reach muscles through drinking (pathway problem), while this choice argues that muscles already get more oxygen than they can use (absorption problem). Both explain why adding oxygen to drinking water won't improve performance.

C
world-class athletes turn in record performance without such water

This statement about world-class athletes performing well without SuperOXY water provides empirical evidence rather than scientific reasoning. The boldface explains the biological mechanism of why the water can't work, while this choice just shows that people succeed without it. These serve different argumentative functions.

D
frequent physical exercise increases the body's ability to take in and use oxygen

This talks about exercise increasing oxygen uptake ability, which is about improving the body's capacity rather than explaining why SuperOXY water specifically doesn't work. The boldface provides a reason against the water's effectiveness, while this discusses exercise benefits - different functions entirely.

E
lack of oxygen is not the only factor limiting human physical performance

This broadens the discussion to other limiting factors beyond oxygen, which shifts focus away from the oxygen-specific argument. The boldface specifically explains why oxygen can't be delivered through drinking water, while this choice minimizes oxygen's importance altogether - opposite functions.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.