Native American women of the Greater American Southwest understood ceramic technology long before they began manufacturing ceramic containers. Ceramic...
GMAT Reading Comprehension : (RC) Questions
Native American women of the Greater American Southwest understood ceramic technology long before they began manufacturing ceramic containers. Ceramic containers appeared over a millennium after the introduction of agriculture among southwestern Native American groups that had previously relied solely upon foraging, and approximately eight hundred years after the archaeological record indicates ceramic figurines first appeared in the region. To explain this lag, anthropologist James Brown proposed that the manufacture of ceramic containers began as these groups became increasingly sedentary and more reliant upon agriculture and developed greater need for storage containers. He argued further that since pottery making fit easily into women's schedules, the labor of making containers had negligible costs. Subsequent research has shown that pottery making exacerbated the scheduling problems of women, whose child-care responsibilities, foraging activities, and other contributions to subsistence were already greater than during the preceramic period. Other evidence, however, does seem to support Brown's argument that increased need for containers was important to the inception of pottery making. Pottery containers provided a means of storing and cooking food that enhanced the nutritional yield of a given crop. As southwestern populations became more reliant on agriculture for subsistence, they had to increase their crops' nutritional yield, since low population densities impeded expansion of field systems.
The passage supports which of the following inferences regarding ceramic technology?
1. Passage Analysis:
Progressive Passage Analysis
Text from Passage | Analysis |
---|---|
Native American women of the Greater American Southwest understood ceramic technology long before they began manufacturing ceramic containers. | What it says: Women knew how to make ceramics but didn't make containers for a long time. What it does: Introduces a puzzle - why the gap between knowledge and application? Source/Type: Factual statement Connection to Previous Sentences: Opening statement - establishes the central mystery Visualization: Timeline: Women learn ceramic tech → [GAP] → Women start making containers Reading Strategy Insight: This sets up the main question the passage will answer. The entire passage will explain this gap. What We Know So Far: There was a delay between ceramic knowledge and container making What We Don't Know Yet: How long the gap was, why it existed |
Ceramic containers appeared over a millennium after the introduction of agriculture among southwestern Native American groups that had previously relied solely upon foraging, and approximately eight hundred years after the archaeological record indicates ceramic figurines first appeared in the region. | What it says: Container making started 1000+ years after farming began, and 800 years after ceramic figurines appeared. What it does: Provides specific timeframes for the gap mentioned in sentence 1 Source/Type: Archaeological evidence Connection to Previous Sentences: This elaborates on sentence 1 by giving us concrete numbers. This is helpful detail, not new complexity! Visualization: Year 0: Groups switch from foraging to agriculture Year 200: Ceramic figurines appear Year 1000+: Ceramic containers finally appear Reading Strategy Insight: The author is helping us understand the scale of the delay. Feel confident - this reinforces sentence 1 with specifics. |
• The passage states ceramic technology was understood "long before" container manufacturing began
• Ceramic figurines appeared 200 years after agriculture, but the technology existed before that
• This choice incorrectly suggests the technology and agriculture developed simultaneously
• The passage provides specific archaeological timeline evidence (800 years, over 1000 years)
• The author uses archaeological record as reliable evidence throughout
• No suggestion in the passage that dating ceramic technology inception is difficult
• The passage focuses on women's roles in pottery making, not specialized artisan groups
• No mention of knowledge being "closely guarded" or belonging to specialized groups
• The discussion centers on practical needs and scheduling, not knowledge restrictions
• The timeline clearly shows figurines appeared 800 years before containers
• Both figurines and containers are ceramic objects, but figurines aren't vessels
• This aligns perfectly with the chronological evidence in the passage
• The passage establishes that agriculture came first, then figurines, then much later containers
• The passage indicates ceramic technology existed before agriculture was introduced
• The development wasn't prompted by agricultural technology, but rather container-making was prompted by agricultural needs
• This choice confuses the development of the technology with its later application for containers