Loading...
Melanosomes are granules that produce melanin (a type of pigment) in animals and can be found in bird feathers. An ancient fossilized feather contains dark stripes made from preserved carbon structures similar in size and shape to melanosomes in modern feathers. Although skeptics have pointed out that ancient bacteria could leave carbon remains of the same size and shape, a prominent paleontologist argues that the structures in the feather are almost certainly melonosomes.
Which of the following, if true, would most help justify the prominent paleontologist's judgment that the structures are almost certainly melanosomes?
| Text from Passage | Analysis |
| Melanosomes are granules that produce melanin (a type of pigment) in animals and can be found in bird feathers. |
|
| An ancient fossilized feather contains dark stripes made from preserved carbon structures similar in size and shape to melanosomes in modern feathers. |
|
| Although skeptics have pointed out that ancient bacteria could leave carbon remains of the same size and shape, a prominent paleontologist argues that the structures in the feather are almost certainly melonosomes. |
|
"We start with background info about melanosomes, then learn about fossil evidence that looks like melanosomes, and finally see that there's a debate between skeptics (who think it's bacteria) and a paleontologist (who's confident it's melanosomes)"
"The prominent paleontologist believes the carbon structures in the fossil feather are almost certainly melanosomes (not bacteria)"
"The paleontologist's conclusion is based on the similarity between the fossil carbon structures and modern melanosomes, but we need additional evidence to justify this confidence since bacteria would leave identical-looking remains"
Strengthen - We need to find information that would increase our belief in the paleontologist's conclusion that the carbon structures are melanosomes rather than bacteria remains
The key claim is qualitative and categorical - the paleontologist argues the structures are 'almost certainly melanosomes' despite skeptics suggesting they could be bacteria remains. Both alternatives would leave identical carbon traces in terms of size and shape
Since the main challenge is that bacteria and melanosomes would leave identical carbon remains, we need to find evidence that either:
This tells us that modern feathers don't usually have bacterial carbon remains, but we're dealing with an ancient fossilized feather. The conditions that preserve ancient fossils could be very different from what we see in modern feathers, so this doesn't really help distinguish whether the ancient structures were melanosomes or bacteria.
This is just stating what would be true if the structures were melanosomes - it's circular reasoning. We're trying to determine whether they ARE melanosomes, so saying 'if they are melanosomes, then they created stripes' doesn't provide any new evidence to support that conclusion.
Finding similar structures in other fossilized feathers doesn't help us determine whether these structures are melanosomes or bacteria. Both could be commonly preserved in fossils, so this evidence is neutral and doesn't support either interpretation.
This actually weakens the paleontologist's position! If ancient bacteria of this size and shape were commonly found in biological structures other than feathers, this makes it more likely that the structures could be bacteria remains, not melanosomes.
This provides the key distinguishing evidence we need! If bacteria in feathers distribute evenly throughout the feather rather than in discrete stripes, then the fact that these carbon structures form distinct stripes strongly suggests they're melanosomes (which create pigmentation patterns) rather than bacteria remains. This directly addresses why the paleontologist can be confident despite the size and shape similarity.