e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves short-term. Companies' hopes that promotions...

GMAT Reading Comprehension : (RC) Questions

Source: Official Guide
Reading Comprehension
Business
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves short-term. Companies' hopes that promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify.


A price promotion entices only a brand's long-term or "loyal" customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced. They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of their customary brands is temporarily available at a reduced price. A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have lingering aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to a brand's reputation or erosion of customer loyalty, as is often feared.


So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to management, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line.

Ques. 1/4

The primary purpose of the passage is to

A
compare the arguments in favor of a certain strategy with those against it
B
attack a certain strategy by enumerating its negative consequences
C
justify the use of a certain strategy in light of certain criticisms that have been made against it
D
advocate a particular strategy by arguing against an alternative
E
explain the effects of a certain strategy and the primary motivations for adopting it
Solution

1. Passage Analysis:

Progressive Passage Analysis


Text from PassageAnalysis
Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves short-term.What it says: When companies temporarily lower prices, any boost in sales doesn't last long.

What it does: Introduces the main finding about price promotions

Source/Type: Research findings (factual claim)

Connection to Previous Sentences: This is our starting point - no previous sentences to connect to

Visualization:
Company normally sells 100 units/month at $50
During 1-month promotion at $40: sells 200 units
After promotion ends: back to 100 units/month

What We Know So Far: Price promotions give temporary sales boosts
What We Don't Know Yet: Why this happens, what companies hoped for, specific details

Reading Strategy Insight: This opening sentence gives us the "big picture" conclusion first - expect the rest to explain WHY this is true.
Companies' hopes that promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify.What it says: Companies wanted lasting benefits from promotions, but didn't get them. Researchers know why.

What it does: Restates sentence 1 from companies' perspective and promises explanation

Source/Type: Researcher conclusions about company expectations

Connection to Previous Sentences:
- Sentence 1 told us: Effects are short-term
- NOW Sentence 2: Companies WANTED long-term effects but didn't get them
- This is the SAME information, just from a different angle!

Visualization:
Company expectation: Promotion → temporary boost → lasting higher sales
Reality: Promotion → temporary boost → back to normal

Reading Strategy Insight: Feel confident here - this isn't new complexity, it's just restating the same idea while setting up the explanation to come.
Answer Choices Explained
A
compare the arguments in favor of a certain strategy with those against it
This passage doesn't compare arguments in favor versus against price promotions. Instead of presenting competing viewpoints, it explains research findings and management behavior. There's no "pro vs. con" structure - the author presents factual explanations, not debates.
B
attack a certain strategy by enumerating its negative consequences
The passage doesn't attack price promotions - it explains them neutrally. The author acknowledges promotions have "legitimate uses, such as reducing excess inventory". The tone is explanatory and analytical, not critical or attacking.
C
justify the use of a certain strategy in light of certain criticisms that have been made against it
The passage doesn't justify using price promotions. Instead, it explains why the strategy persists despite its limitations. The author presents management psychology as an explanation, not a justification.
D
advocate a particular strategy by arguing against an alternative
The passage doesn't advocate for price promotions as the preferred strategy. There's no alternative strategy being argued against. The passage is descriptive rather than prescriptive.
E
explain the effects of a certain strategy and the primary motivations for adopting it
This is correct. The passage clearly explains the effects of price promotions (temporary sales boosts, no lasting benefits, only attracts loyal customers) and explicitly addresses motivations in the second half, asking "So why do companies spend so much on price promotions?" and answering with management psychology.
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.