e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position...

GMAT Critical Reasoning : (CR) Questions

Source: Official Guide
Critical Reasoning
Boldface
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Business Consultant: Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive's dealings with external businesses. The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation's executives use executive titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation.

In the consultant's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A
The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a reason for considering that goal to be undesirable.
B
The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the second presents a reason against adopting that strategy.
C
The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal.
D
The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of that support.
E
The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the evidence offered against that belief.
Solution

Understanding the Passage

Text from Passage Analysis
"Some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that"
  • What it says: Some companies avoid giving executives titles like "VP" or "Director" because they're worried about certain problems
  • Visualization: Company A: Uses titles (CEO, VP, Director) → Company B: No titles (everyone just has name/department)
  • What it does: Sets up the problem that some corporations face with executive titles
  • Source: Author describing what some corporations believe
(Boldface 1) "the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy"
  • What it says: When people have official titles showing their rank, it creates barriers to communication between different levels of the company
  • Visualization: With titles: Junior employee hesitates to approach "VP Marketing" directly → Without titles: Junior employee easily talks to "Sarah from Marketing"
  • What it does: Explains the specific reason why some corporations avoid using executive titles
  • Source: The corporations' viewpoint (as reported by the author)
"Since an executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however,"
  • What it says: But when dealing with people outside the company, having a title makes others take the executive more seriously
  • Visualization: Meeting with clients: "John Smith" gets basic treatment vs. "John Smith, VP of Sales" gets premium treatment and attention
  • What it does: Introduces a contrasting benefit of using titles that counteracts the internal communication problem
  • Source: Author's observation
(Boldface 2) "use of a title can facilitate an executive's dealings with external businesses"
  • What it says: Having an official title makes it easier for executives to work with companies and clients outside their organization
  • Visualization: Negotiation scenario: Executive with "Director" title closes $500K deal vs. same person without title struggles to get $300K deal
  • What it does: Completes the counterargument by explaining how titles provide external business advantages
  • Source: Author's view
"The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles externally but not internally"
  • What it says: The clear solution is for executives to use their titles only when dealing with outside parties, but not when working inside their own company
  • Visualization: Same person: Internal emails signed "Sarah" but external emails signed "Sarah Johnson, VP Marketing"
  • What it does: Presents the author's main conclusion - the recommended solution to balance both concerns
  • Source: Author's conclusion
"since even if it is widely known that the corporation's executives use executive titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation"
  • What it says: Even if everyone inside the company knows that executives use titles when dealing with outsiders, just knowing this fact won't create communication barriers internally
  • Visualization: Employees think: "I know Sarah uses 'VP Marketing' with clients, but she's still just Sarah to me in our daily work"
  • What it does: Provides supporting reasoning for why the compromise solution will work
  • Source: Author's reasoning

Overall Structure

The author is presenting a balanced analysis of a business problem and proposing a compromise solution. The flow moves from problem → counterpoint → solution → justification.

Main Conclusion: Executives should use their corporate titles externally but not internally as a compromise solution.

Boldface Segments

  • Boldface 1: the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy
  • Boldface 2: use of a title can facilitate an executive's dealings with external businesses

Boldface Understanding

Boldface 1:

  • Function: Explains the specific concern that leads some corporations to avoid executive titles
  • Direction: This represents a problem that the author's conclusion aims to solve, so it opposes unlimited use of titles but supports the need for the author's compromise solution

Boldface 2:

  • Function: Provides the counterbalancing benefit of using titles that must be preserved in any solution
  • Direction: This represents a benefit that the author's conclusion aims to preserve, so it supports the author's ultimate position that titles should be used externally

Structural Classification

Boldface 1:

  • Structural Role: Supporting reason for a position that the author acknowledges but seeks to address through compromise
  • Predicted Answer Patterns: "concern that leads to" "problem that the conclusion addresses" "consideration balanced in the recommendation"

Boldface 2:

  • Structural Role: Supporting evidence for the benefit that the author's conclusion aims to capture
  • Predicted Answer Patterns: "consideration supporting" "advantage preserved by" "benefit that supports the conclusion"
Answer Choices Explained
A
The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a reason for considering that goal to be undesirable.

'The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal' - ✗ WRONG - The first boldface isn't about achieving a goal; it explains why corporations avoid using titles. It's describing a problem, not an obstacle to a goal.

'the second presents a reason for considering that goal to be undesirable' - ✗ WRONG - The second boldface doesn't make any goal undesirable; it presents a benefit of using titles that supports external business dealings.

B
The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the second presents a reason against adopting that strategy.

'The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy' - ✓ CORRECT - The fear that titles inhibit communication is exactly the consideration that led corporations to adopt the strategy of shunning executive titles.

'the second presents a reason against adopting that strategy' - ✓ CORRECT - The fact that titles facilitate external business dealings is a compelling reason against completely avoiding the use of titles.

C
The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal.

'The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant' - ✗ WRONG - The consultant doesn't dismiss the communication concern as insignificant; instead, the compromise solution specifically addresses this concern by avoiding internal title use.

'the second is a consideration that serves as the basis for that dismissal' - ✗ WRONG - Since the consultant doesn't dismiss the first concern, the second can't be the basis for a dismissal that didn't happen.

D
The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of that support.

'The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support' - ✗ WRONG - The consultant doesn't offer support for the first boldface; it's presented as the corporations' concern, not something the consultant is arguing for.

'the second is part of that support' - ✗ WRONG - The second boldface actually works against the first, not in support of it, since it presents a benefit of using titles.

E
The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the evidence offered against that belief.

'The first is a belief against which evidence is offered' - ✗ WRONG - No evidence is offered against the belief that titles inhibit internal communication; the consultant accepts this as valid and works around it with the compromise.

'the second is part of the evidence offered against that belief' - ✗ WRONG - The second boldface isn't evidence against the first; it's a separate consideration about external benefits of titles.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.