e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing cancer, researches believe that infection by the SV40...

GMAT Critical Reasoning : (CR) Questions

Source: Official Guide
Critical Reasoning
Strengthen
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing cancer, researches believe that infection by the SV40 virus is a contributing cause, since in the United States 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from healthy tissue, contain SV40. SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus. Reseachers hypothesize that this vaccine was the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the researchers' hypothesis?

A
SV40 is widely used as a research tool in cancer laboratories.
B
Changes in the technique of manufacturing the vaccine now prevent contamination with SV40.
C
Recently discovered samples of the vaccine dating from 1960 still show traces of the virus.
D
In a small percentage of cases of mesothelioma, there is no history of exposure to asbestos.
E
In Finland, where the polio vaccine was never contaminated, samples from mesotheliomas do not contain SV40.
Solution

Passage Analysis:

Text from Passage Analysis
Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing cancer, researches believe that infection by the SV40 virus is a contributing cause
  • What it says: Asbestos is the main cause of mesothelioma cancer, but researchers think SV40 virus also plays a role
  • What it does: Sets up the basic premise that mesothelioma has multiple causes
  • What it is: Researchers' belief/hypothesis
since in the United States 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from healthy tissue, contain SV40
  • What it says: 60% of mesothelioma samples have SV40 virus, while 0% of healthy tissue samples do
  • What it does: Provides evidence to support the claim that SV40 contributes to mesothelioma
  • What it is: Study findings
  • Visualization: Mesothelioma samples: 60 out of 100 contain SV40 // Healthy tissue samples: 0 out of 100 contain SV40
SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus
  • What it says: SV40 comes from monkeys, but some 1960 polio vaccines accidentally contained this virus
  • What it does: Explains how humans could have been exposed to a monkey virus
  • What it is: Factual background information
Researchers hypothesize that this vaccine was the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later
  • What it says: Scientists think the contaminated 1960 polio vaccine is why we see SV40 in mesothelioma cases today
  • What it does: Presents the main hypothesis connecting the vaccine contamination to current cancer cases
  • What it is: Researchers' hypothesis

Argument Flow:

The passage starts by establishing that SV40 virus contributes to mesothelioma, then provides statistical evidence showing SV40 is present in cancer samples but not healthy ones. It then explains how humans could have been exposed to this monkey virus through contaminated vaccines in 1960, leading to the hypothesis that this vaccine contamination explains today's cancer cases.

Main Conclusion:

The contaminated polio vaccine from 1960 was the source of SV40 virus found in mesothelioma cases decades later.

Logical Structure:

The argument uses correlation evidence (SV40 present in 60% of cancer samples vs 0% in healthy samples) combined with historical facts about vaccine contamination to support a causal hypothesis linking past vaccine exposure to current cancer cases containing the virus.

Prethinking:

Question type:

Strengthen - We need to find information that makes the researchers' hypothesis more believable. The hypothesis is that the 1960 contaminated polio vaccine was the source of SV40 virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.

Precision of Claims

The key claims involve timing (1960 vaccine contamination, decades later cancer), causation (vaccine as source of virus in cancer), and population exposure (who got the contaminated vaccine and later developed mesothelioma with SV40).

Strategy

To strengthen the hypothesis that the 1960 contaminated polio vaccine caused SV40 to appear in mesotheliomas decades later, we need evidence that creates a stronger connection between the vaccine and the cancer cases. This could include: timing evidence showing the vaccine came before the cancers, demographic evidence showing people who got the vaccine are more likely to have SV40-positive mesotheliomas, or evidence ruling out other sources of SV40 exposure.

Answer Choices Explained
A
SV40 is widely used as a research tool in cancer laboratories.
This actually weakens the hypothesis rather than strengthening it. If SV40 is widely used in research labs, this provides an alternative explanation for how the virus could have gotten into mesothelioma samples - through laboratory contamination rather than through the 1960 vaccine. This introduces doubt about the researchers' hypothesis by suggesting another possible source.
B
Changes in the technique of manufacturing the vaccine now prevent contamination with SV40.
This tells us about current vaccine manufacturing but doesn't provide any evidence about whether the 1960 vaccine was actually the source of SV40 in today's mesotheliomas. While it confirms that contamination was possible in 1960, it doesn't strengthen the connection between that past contamination and current cancer cases.
C
Recently discovered samples of the vaccine dating from 1960 still show traces of the virus.
This confirms that some 1960 vaccines were indeed contaminated with SV40, but we already knew this from the passage. What we need is evidence linking this contaminated vaccine to the SV40 found in mesotheliomas decades later. This choice doesn't establish that causal connection.
D
In a small percentage of cases of mesothelioma, there is no history of exposure to asbestos.
This information is about asbestos exposure, not about SV40 or the vaccine hypothesis. While it might suggest that other factors besides asbestos contribute to mesothelioma, it doesn't specifically support the claim that the 1960 contaminated vaccine was the source of SV40 in these cancers.
E
In Finland, where the polio vaccine was never contaminated, samples from mesotheliomas do not contain SV40.
This is the strongest support for the researchers' hypothesis. It creates a perfect comparison: Finland had clean vaccines and shows no SV40 in mesotheliomas, while the US had contaminated vaccines and shows SV40 in 60% of mesotheliomas. This comparative evidence strongly suggests that vaccine contamination is indeed the source of SV40 in cancer cases, exactly as the researchers hypothesize.
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.