Loading...
Under a certain company's medical insurance plan, the amount an employee must pay for medical expenses consists of payment for the first $450 of expenses plus 20 percent of additional expenses, up to a maximum total payment of $1,350 per year. All remaining expenses are paid by the plan. Last year, if an employee paid the maximum amount for medical expenses, what is the least amount that the plan could have paid?
Let's break down this insurance plan in plain English:
How the employee payment works:
What we need to find:
If an employee paid exactly $1,350 (the maximum), what's the smallest amount the insurance plan could have paid?
Process Skill: TRANSLATE - Converting the insurance language into clear mathematical understanding
Let's work backwards from the $1,350 maximum payment.
Breaking down the $1,350 payment:
Since the employee pays 20% of additional expenses beyond the first $450, we can figure out how much those "additional expenses" were:
If $900 represents 20% of additional expenses, then:
Total medical expenses:
Let's verify: Employee pays \(\$450 + (20\% × \$4,500) = \$450 + \$900 = \$1,350\) ✓
Process Skill: INFER - Working backwards from the maximum payment to find total expenses
Now we can find what the insurance plan paid:
Simple subtraction:
Double-checking our work:
The least amount that the plan could have paid is $3,600.
This matches answer choice C. $3,600.
1. Misunderstanding the payment structure
Students often confuse the layered payment system. They might think the employee pays 20% of ALL medical expenses rather than understanding that the employee pays 100% of the first $450 PLUS 20% of any additional expenses beyond that initial $450. This fundamental misreading leads to completely incorrect calculations.
2. Misinterpreting "least amount the plan could have paid"
Some students get confused by this wording and think they need to find a scenario where the plan pays less money. They don't realize that when the employee pays the maximum $1,350, there's only ONE possible total expense amount, which means there's only ONE amount the plan could have paid - not multiple scenarios to choose from.
3. Focusing on the wrong constraint
Students might overlook that the employee paid "the maximum amount" ($1,350) and instead try to work with other constraints or create hypothetical scenarios. Missing this key constraint means they can't properly set up the problem to work backwards from the maximum payment.
1. Arithmetic errors in percentage calculations
When calculating that $900 represents 20% of additional expenses, students often make errors like: \(\$900 × 0.20 = \$180\) (instead of \(\$900 ÷ 0.20 = \$4,500\)). This confusion between multiplying by the percentage versus dividing by it is common when working backwards from a percentage.
2. Incorrect breakdown of the $1,350 payment
Students might incorrectly assume the entire $1,350 is subject to the 20% rule, forgetting that $450 of it represents the full payment for the first $450 of expenses. This leads them to calculate: \(\$1,350 ÷ 0.20 = \$6,750\) in additional expenses rather than \((\$1,350 - \$450) ÷ 0.20 = \$4,500\).
3. Adding amounts in wrong sequence
Even with correct individual calculations, students sometimes add the amounts incorrectly. For example, they might calculate the additional expenses as $4,500 but then forget to add back the initial $450, leading to a total medical expense of $4,500 instead of $4,950.
1. Selecting an intermediate calculation as the final answer
Students often select $4,500 (answer choice D) because this represents the additional expenses beyond the first $450, or they might select $1,080 (answer choice B) through some miscalculation. They lose track of what the question is actually asking for - the amount the plan paid.
2. Confusing what the plan paid versus what the employee paid
Some students calculate everything correctly but then select $1,350 as their answer (which isn't even listed), thinking the question asks for the employee payment rather than the plan payment. Or they might accidentally select an amount that represents some portion of the employee's payment structure.