Loading...
Dick and Jane each saved \(\$3,000\) in 1989. In 1990 Dick saved \(8\%\) more than in 1989, and together he and Jane saved a total of \(\$5,000\). Approximately what percent less did Jane save in 1990 than in 1989?
Let's break down what we know in plain English:
The key insight is that we can find Dick's 1990 savings, then use the total to find Jane's 1990 savings, and finally compare Jane's amounts.
Process Skill: TRANSLATE - Converting the word problem into clear mathematical relationships
Dick saved 8% more in 1990 than in 1989. Let's think about this step by step:
Alternatively, we can think of this as Dick saving 108% of his 1989 amount:
Now we use the fact that together they saved \(\$5,000\) in 1990:
So Jane saved \(\$1,760\) in 1990, compared to \(\$3,000\) in 1989.
Now let's find what percent less Jane saved in 1990 compared to 1989:
To find the percentage decrease, we compare the decrease to her original 1989 amount:
Rounding to the nearest whole percent, Jane saved approximately 41% less in 1990 than in 1989.
Jane saved approximately 41% less in 1990 than in 1989.
Looking at the answer choices, this matches choice C: 41%.
Answer: C
1. Misinterpreting what "8 percent more" means: Students might think Dick saved 8% of the total (\(\$5,000\)) more, rather than 8% more than his own 1989 savings of \(\$3,000\). This leads to calculating Dick's 1990 savings incorrectly as \(\$3,000 + 0.08(\$5,000) = \$3,400\) instead of \(\$3,240\).
2. Confusing the base year for percentage comparison: Students might try to calculate Jane's percentage change using her 1990 savings (\(\$1,760\)) as the base instead of her 1989 savings (\(\$3,000\)). This would lead to the wrong formula: (decrease ÷ 1990 amount) instead of (decrease ÷ 1989 amount).
3. Setting up the problem with incorrect total: Students might misread and think the \(\$5,000\) total refers to their combined savings over both years (1989 + 1990) rather than just their 1990 savings, leading to a completely different equation setup.
1. Arithmetic errors in percentage calculations: When calculating 8% of \(\$3,000\), students might compute \(0.8 \times \$3,000 = \$2,400\) instead of \(0.08 \times \$3,000 = \$240\), leading to Dick's 1990 savings being \(\$5,400\) instead of \(\$3,240\).
2. Sign errors in subtraction: Students might calculate Jane's 1990 savings as \(\$3,240 - \$5,000 = -\$1,760\) instead of \(\$5,000 - \$3,240 = \$1,760\), not realizing they've reversed the subtraction.
3. Decimal conversion mistakes: When converting \(\$1,240 ÷ \$3,000\) to a percentage, students might forget to multiply by 100 or make errors like getting 4.13% instead of 41.3%, or incorrectly calculating the division as 0.041 instead of 0.413.
1. Selecting the wrong direction of change: Students might calculate the correct percentage (41%) but select an answer that represents "41% more" rather than "41% less," potentially choosing a value like 141% if available, or getting confused about the direction of Jane's change.
2. Using Dick's percentage instead of Jane's: Students might correctly calculate that Dick saved 8% more but then mistakenly select 8% (choice A) thinking the question asked about Dick's change rather than Jane's change.