Loading...
Candidate McFe received \(12,000\) votes, which was \(\frac{1}{4}\) of the total number of votes. If \(\mathrm{x}\) additional people had voted and each had voted for Mcfee, then Mcfee would have received \(\frac{1}{3}\) of the total number of votes. What is the value of \(\mathrm{x}\)?
Let's break down what's happening in this voting scenario in plain English. McFee received 12,000 votes, and we're told this represents exactly \(\frac{1}{4}\) of all the votes cast. Think of it like a pie chart - McFee's slice is \(\frac{1}{4}\) of the whole pie.
Then we have a hypothetical situation: if x additional people had voted and all of them voted for McFee, then McFee's share would have been \(\frac{1}{3}\) of the total votes (including those x new votes).
We need to find the value of x - how many additional votes would create this scenario.
Process Skill: TRANSLATE - Converting the voting scenario into mathematical relationships
Since McFee got 12,000 votes and this was \(\frac{1}{4}\) of the total, we can think about this simply: if 12,000 is one-fourth, then the whole amount is four times as much.
Original total votes = \(4 × 12,000 = 48,000\) votes
Let's verify this makes sense: \(12,000 ÷ 48,000 = \frac{1}{4}\) ✓
Now let's think through the hypothetical scenario. If x additional people vote (all for McFee), then:
- McFee's new vote count = 12,000 + x
- Total new vote count = 48,000 + x (original votes plus the x new votes)
We're told that in this scenario, McFee would have \(\frac{1}{3}\) of the total votes. So McFee's votes would equal one-third of the new total.
In mathematical terms: \((12,000 + x) = \frac{1}{3} × (48,000 + x)\)
Let's solve this step by step, keeping the arithmetic simple:
\((12,000 + x) = \frac{1}{3} × (48,000 + x)\)
Multiply both sides by 3 to eliminate the fraction:
\(3(12,000 + x) = 48,000 + x\)
\(36,000 + 3x = 48,000 + x\)
Subtract x from both sides:
\(36,000 + 2x = 48,000\)
Subtract 36,000 from both sides:
\(2x = 12,000\)
Divide by 2:
\(x = 6,000\)
Let's verify: If 6,000 additional people vote for McFee:
- McFee's new total: 12,000 + 6,000 = 18,000 votes
- New total votes: 48,000 + 6,000 = 54,000 votes
- McFee's fraction: \(\frac{18,000}{54,000} = \frac{1}{3}\) ✓
The value of x is 6,000.
This matches answer choice B.
Students often misunderstand what happens in the hypothetical scenario. They might think that McFee's original 12,000 votes stay the same and x additional people vote for other candidates, rather than understanding that all x additional people vote specifically for McFee. This leads to setting up the wrong equation where McFee still has only 12,000 votes instead of (12,000 + x) votes.
2. Confusing the total vote countsStudents may set up the equation using the original total (48,000) instead of the new total (48,000 + x). They might write: \((12,000 + x) = \frac{1}{3} × 48,000\), forgetting that when x additional people vote, the total number of votes also increases by x.
3. Misunderstanding the fraction relationshipSome students might set up a proportion incorrectly, thinking that if McFee goes from \(\frac{1}{4}\) to \(\frac{1}{3}\) of votes, they can simply use the difference between these fractions \((\frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4})\) to solve for x, rather than setting up the proper equation with the new vote totals.
When solving \((12,000 + x) = \frac{1}{3} × (48,000 + x)\), students often make mistakes when multiplying both sides by 3. They might incorrectly get \(3(12,000) + x = 48,000 + x\) instead of \(3(12,000) + 3x = 48,000 + x\), forgetting to distribute the 3 to both terms on the left side.
2. Arithmetic calculation mistakesStudents may make simple computational errors, such as calculating \(3 × 12,000 = 32,000\) instead of \(36,000\), or making errors when performing the subtraction steps (36,000 - 48,000 instead of 48,000 - 36,000).
No likely faltering points - The question asks for the value of x directly, and once students solve the equation correctly, the answer choice selection is straightforward with clear verification possible.