When the KJ Reservoir (KJR) was built, a single, well-known species of fish was introduced for its role in the...
GMAT Multi Source Reasoning : (MSR) Questions
When the KJ Reservoir (KJR) was built, a single, well-known species of fish was introduced for its role in the new ecosystem. KJR is a popular destination for a public fishing season that extends from June through August each year. Each May 1, the area's wildlife management team generates an estimate of the number of these fish in the reservoir. The team has determined that the fish's population should be no less than 1,500 fish at the start of the fishing season—less than 1,500, and the team acquires and releases enough fish to make up the difference.
The fish of this species reproduce once a year in mid-September. Due to environmental factors, of the species's total population at the end of September, 80% will survive until the following May. It is estimated that KJR cannot support a healthy, reproductive fish population greater than 2,000.
Based on the information provided, which one of the following was the team's estimate of KJR's fish population?
OWNING THE DATASET
Understanding Source A: Text Source - KJ Reservoir Management Information
Information from Dataset | Analysis |
---|---|
""When the KJ Reservoir (KJR) was built, a single, well-known species of fish was introduced for its role in the new ecosystem"" |
|
""public fishing season that extends from June through August each year"" |
|
""Each May 1, the area's wildlife management team generates an estimate of the number of these fish"" |
|
""fish's population should be no less than 1,500 fish at the start of the fishing season—less than 1,500, and the team acquires and releases enough fish to make up the difference"" |
|
""fish of this species reproduce once a year in mid-September"" |
|
""80% will survive until the following May"" |
|
""KJR cannot support a healthy, reproductive fish population greater than 2,000"" |
|
Summary: KJR is an actively managed artificial reservoir with one fish species, where managers maintain populations between 1,500-2,000 fish through annual May assessments and stocking when needed.
Understanding Source B: Text Source - Population Estimation Methodology
Information from Dataset | Analysis |
---|---|
""capture a number (M) of individual animals of the species (the capture group) without doing harm. Each is marked, released, and allowed to disperse"" |
|
""A number (N) of individual animals are then captured in a second group (the recapture group)"" |
|
""some of which will have been captured in both groups, provided both the capture group and recapture group are sufficiently large"" |
|
""number of fish common to both groups/N = M/P"" |
|
Summary: Source B describes the mark-recapture method for estimating populations, which is the same technique used by KJR's management team for their annual May 1 fish counts.
Understanding Source C: Mixed Source - Fish Reproduction Model and Data
Text Analysis
Information from Dataset | Analysis |
---|---|
""predict the annual increase in fish population in KJR due to reproduction"" |
|
""P = fish population at the start of September C = maximum supported healthy fish population r = constant chosen to fit the model to the data"" |
|
""On May 1 last year, KJR's wildlife management team marked the 60 fish comprising the capture group. The recapture group had 100 fish, including exactly 5 from the capture group"" |
|
""population increase = rP(1 - P/C)"" |
|
Graph Analysis
- Chart/Table Analysis:
- Shows relationship between fish population (x-axis) and population increase (y-axis)
- Key patterns observed: Inverted parabola peaking at P = 1,000 with maximum increase of 50 fish
- Zero growth occurs at P = 0 and P = 2,000
- Specific point marked: (400, 32) showing 32 fish increase when population is 400
- Key finding: Growth is highest at mid-range populations and decreases toward carrying capacity
- Connection to Source A: The zero growth at 2,000 confirms the carrying capacity limit; at the 1,500 minimum threshold, reproduction adds 37 fish
- Connection to Source B: The 1,200 fish calculated from last year's mark-recapture would produce 48 new fish according to this model
Summary: Source C provides the reproduction model and a real example showing last year's population was 1,200 fish (below minimum), demonstrating how all three sources work together in the complete management system.
Overall Summary
- The KJR fish management system uses mark-recapture counting every May 1 to estimate population
- Maintains a minimum of 1,500 fish through stocking
- Manages reproduction using a model that peaks at 1,000 fish
- With a carrying capacity of 2,000 fish and 80% annual survival rate
- The reservoir operates in the upper half of the growth curve (1,500-2,000 range) where reproduction naturally slows, requiring active management to maintain adequate fishing stocks
Question Analysis
Understanding the Question
- What the question is asking: What number of fish did the wildlife management team calculate when they did their population estimate using the mark-recapture method?
- Key constraints:
- Must be the team's estimate (not actual population)
- Based on information provided in the sources
- Looking for a specific numerical result
- Answer type needed: Numerical calculation
Connecting to Our Passage Analysis
- The analysis directly contains the calculation result, which states 'Last year's May 1 population was about 1,200 fish (quick calculation: 60 × 100 ÷ 5)'
- Can answer from analysis alone: YES - The analysis explicitly provides the calculation and result
Solution Analysis
Finding the Answer
- Evaluating each numerical option against the mark-recapture calculation from the analysis
- Our calculation: The team's estimate was calculated using the mark-recapture formula with M = 60, N = 100, and 5 fish common to both groups
Option Evaluations
Statement 1 Analysis
""1000""
- What this suggests: Is the team's estimate 1000 fish?
- Why this is wrong: The calculation yields 60 × 100 ÷ 5 = 1200, not 1000
- Result: INCORRECT
Statement 2 Analysis
""1200""
- What this suggests: Is the team's estimate 1200 fish?
- Why this is correct: The calculation yields 60 × 100 ÷ 5 = 1200, which matches exactly
- Result: CORRECT
Statement 3 Analysis
""1400""
- What this suggests: Is the team's estimate 1400 fish?
- Why this is wrong: The calculation yields 1200, not any of these higher values
- Result: INCORRECT
Statement 4 Analysis
""1500""
- What this suggests: Is the team's estimate 1500 fish?
- Why this is wrong: The calculation yields 1200, not any of these higher values
- Result: INCORRECT
Statement 5 Analysis
""2000""
- What this suggests: Is the team's estimate 2000 fish?
- Why this is wrong: The calculation yields 1200, not any of these higher values
- Result: INCORRECT
Verification Check
- Source C provides the specific numbers: M = 60 marked fish, N = 100 recaptured fish, 5 fish common to both groups
- Source B provides the formula: common/N = M/P
- Solving: 5/100 = 60/P ⟹ P = 60 × 100 ÷ 5 = 1200
- The analysis confirms this calculation and identifies it as 'last year's May 1 population'
- This was the team's official estimate using their standard methodology
Answer
1200
1000
1200
1400
1500
2000