What kind of behavior is usually displayed by conflicting factions? In conflicts, some factions resort to aggression and hostility, which...
GMAT Data Sufficiency : (DS) Questions
What kind of behavior is usually displayed by conflicting factions?
- In conflicts, some factions resort to aggression and hostility, which escalates the situation.
- To promote peaceful resolutions, factions should engage in open communication, empathy, and compromise to find mutually.
Understanding the Question
Let's clarify what we're being asked: "What kind of behavior is usually displayed by conflicting factions?"
This question asks us to characterize the typical or usual behavioral patterns of groups in conflict. To have sufficient information, we would need data that tells us what behaviors are commonly displayed - not just possibilities or ideals, but what actually happens in most cases.
Given Information: None provided in the question itself.
What "Sufficient" Means Here: We need information that definitively establishes what behavior is typical, common, or usual among conflicting factions. A few examples won't suffice - we need to know what happens in the majority of cases.
Analyzing Statement 1
Statement 1 tells us: "In conflicts, some factions resort to aggression and hostility, which escalates the situation."
This gives us information that some factions display aggressive and hostile behavior. However, the question asks what behavior is usually displayed.
The word "some" is crucial here - it could mean 10% of factions or 40% of factions. Think of it this way: If I tell you "some students passed the test," can you determine what usually happens to students taking that test? No - because "some" doesn't tell us whether it's the majority or minority.
Without knowing whether aggressive behavior represents the majority or minority of cases, we cannot determine what is typical.
Statement 1 alone is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choices A and D.
Analyzing Statement 2
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2 states: "To promote peaceful resolutions, factions should engage in open communication, empathy, and compromise to find mutually."
Notice the key word: "should". This statement is prescriptive - it tells us what factions should do to achieve peaceful outcomes. This is fundamentally different from describing what factions usually do.
Think of it like saying "To be healthy, people should exercise daily." This doesn't tell us what people usually do - only what they ought to do. The statement provides no information about actual typical behaviors, only recommendations for ideal behavior.
Statement 2 alone is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choice B.
Combining Statements
Looking at both statements together:
- Statement 1: Some factions use aggression and hostility
- Statement 2: Factions should use communication, empathy, and compromise
Even when combined, these statements fail to tell us what behavior is usually displayed. Here's what we still don't know:
- What percentage of factions use aggression vs. other approaches
- Whether the recommended behaviors in Statement 2 are commonly practiced or rarely followed
- What the typical or majority behavior pattern actually is
We have a piece of descriptive information (some use aggression) and a piece of prescriptive information (what should be done), but neither alone nor together tells us what usually happens.
The statements together are NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choice C.
The Answer: E
Neither statement alone nor both statements together provide sufficient information to determine what behavior is usually displayed by conflicting factions.
Answer Choice E: "The statements together are not sufficient."
Key Insight: For questions about what "usually," "typically," or "generally" happens, look for statements that provide statistical or majority information. Partial examples ("some") and prescriptive statements ("should") cannot establish typical patterns.