Was the median height of the 25 children in a certain class at least 2 percent greater than the average...
GMAT Data Sufficiency : (DS) Questions
Was the median height of the \(25\) children in a certain class at least \(2\) percent greater than the average (arithmetic mean) height of the \(25\) children?
- The median height of the \(25\) children was \(2\) centimeters greater than their average height.
- The sum of the heights of the \(25\) children was less than \(2,550\) centimeters
Understanding the Question
We need to determine: Is the median height of 25 children at least 2% greater than their average height?
In other words: Is \(\mathrm{Median} \geq 1.02 \times \mathrm{Average}\)?
This is a yes/no question. Since we have 25 children (odd number), the median is the height of the 13th child when heights are arranged in order.
Key insight: To answer YES or NO definitively, we need to know the exact relationship between median and average.
Analyzing Statement 1
Statement 1 tells us: The median is exactly 2 cm greater than the average.
So: \(\mathrm{Median} = \mathrm{Average} + 2\text{ cm}\)
But here's the crucial question: Does 2 cm represent at least 2% of the average?
The answer depends entirely on the average height:
- If \(\mathrm{average} = 80\text{ cm}\): \(\mathrm{Median} = 82\text{ cm}\). Is \(82 \geq 1.02 \times 80 = 81.6\)? YES ✓
- If \(\mathrm{average} = 120\text{ cm}\): \(\mathrm{Median} = 122\text{ cm}\). Is \(122 \geq 1.02 \times 120 = 122.4\)? NO ✗
Since we get different answers depending on the average height, Statement 1 alone is NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] → Eliminate choices A and D
Analyzing Statement 2
Important: We now analyze Statement 2 independently, forgetting Statement 1 completely.
Statement 2 tells us: The sum of all 25 heights < 2,550 cm
This means: \(\mathrm{Average\,height} < \frac{2550}{25} = 102\text{ cm}\)
But this reveals nothing about how the median compares to the average. The median could be:
- Higher than average (many short children, few very tall ones)
- Equal to average (heights symmetrically distributed)
- Lower than average (many tall children, few very short ones)
Without knowing the median-average relationship, we cannot answer our question.
Statement 2 alone is NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] → Eliminate choice B
Combining Both Statements
Now we use both statements together:
- From Statement 1: \(\mathrm{Median} = \mathrm{Average} + 2\text{ cm}\)
- From Statement 2: \(\mathrm{Average} < 102\text{ cm}\)
The critical question remains: Is 2 cm at least 2% of the average?
Here's the key insight:
- 2% of 100 cm = 2 cm (exactly at the boundary!)
- If \(\mathrm{Average} \leq 100\text{ cm}\) → 2 cm ≥ 2% of average → Answer is YES
- If \(\mathrm{Average} > 100\text{ cm}\) → 2 cm < 2% of average → Answer is NO
But Statement 2 only tells us \(\mathrm{Average} < 102\), which includes values both above and below 100:
Example 1: \(\mathrm{Average} = 99\text{ cm}\)
- \(\mathrm{Median} = 101\text{ cm}\)
- Is \(101 \geq 1.02 \times 99 = 100.98\)? YES ✓
Example 2: \(\mathrm{Average} = 101\text{ cm}\)
- \(\mathrm{Median} = 103\text{ cm}\)
- Is \(103 \geq 1.02 \times 101 = 103.02\)? NO ✗
Since we still get different answers, the statements together are NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] → Eliminate choice C
The Answer: E
The statements together are not sufficient because the critical threshold (\(\mathrm{Average} = 100\text{ cm}\)) falls within the possible range allowed by both statements. We cannot determine a definitive YES or NO.
Answer: E - Both statements together are not sufficient.