e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Two amateur wrestling squads—Squad A and Squad B—competed against each other. Each squad had the same (nonzero) number of its...

GMAT Multi Source Reasoning : (MSR) Questions

Source: Mock
Multi Source Reasoning
Conditions
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query
Problem Statement
Concise Solution
Table

Two amateur wrestling squads—Squad A and Squad B—competed against each other. Each squad had the same (nonzero) number of its members who were contestants. In the competition, each contestant in Squads A and B wrestled against exactly one contestant in the other squad, and no non-contestant member of either squad wrestled. Let \(\mathrm{x}\) be the proportion of Squad A's members who were contestants in the competition and let \(\mathrm{y}\) be the proportion of Squad B's members who were contestants in the competition. In terms of \(\mathrm{x}\) and \(\mathrm{y}\) only, what is the proportion of the total number of members in the two squads who were contestants in the competition?

Ques. 1/3

Which one of the following procedures, when applied to the last mathematical expression in the Concise Solution tab, gives a mathematical expression that answers the question asked in the Problem Statement tab?

A

Multiply both the numerator and denominator by a.

B

Multiply both the numerator and denominator by y.

C

Divide both the numerator and denominator by a.

D

Subtract a and then divide the result \(\mathrm{a + (x/y)a}\).

E

Divide by \(\mathrm{a + (x/y)a}\) and then subtract a from the result.

Solution

OWNING THE DATASET

Understanding Source A: Text - Problem Statement

Information from DatasetAnalysis
""Two amateur wrestling squads—Squad A and Squad B—competed against each other. Each squad had the same (nonzero) number of its members who were contestants.""
  • Two squads with equal numbers of contestants competing
  • Not all squad members necessarily compete
  • Inference: The equal contestant requirement is a key constraint that will shape the mathematical relationship
""In the competition, each contestant in Squads A and B wrestled against exactly one contestant in the other squad""
  • One-to-one matching between contestants
  • Inference: This one-to-one matching forces equal contestant numbers from each squad
""no non-contestant member of either squad wrestled""
  • Clear distinction between contestants and non-contestants
  • Inference: Only designated contestants participate in matches
""Let (mathrm{x}) be the proportion of Squad A's members who were contestants...let (mathrm{y}) be the proportion of Squad B's members who were contestants""
  • (mathrm{x}) and (mathrm{y}) are fractions between 0 and 1
  • Inference: These represent participation rates within each squad
""what is the proportion of the total number of members in the two squads who were contestants in the competition?""
  • Seeking a combined participation rate across both squads
  • Inference: Answer should be expressed in terms of (mathrm{x}) and (mathrm{y}) only

Summary: Source A sets up a wrestling competition where equal numbers from two squads compete, and asks for a formula to find the overall participation rate in terms of individual squad participation rates (mathrm{x}) and (mathrm{y}).


Understanding Source B: Text - Concise Solution

Information from DatasetAnalysis
""Let (mathrm{a}) and (mathrm{b}) be the number of members of Squad A and Squad B, respectively, and let (mathrm{a'}) and (mathrm{b'}) be the number of contestants""
  • Introduces notation: (mathrm{a, b}) for total members; (mathrm{a', b'}) for contestants
  • Inference: Distinguishes between membership and participation
""Clearly, (mathrm{a' = xa}) and (mathrm{b' = yb})""
  • Contestant counts equal total members times participation rates
  • Inference: Direct application of proportion definitions
  • Linkage to Source A: This mathematically expresses the (mathrm{x}) and (mathrm{y}) proportions defined in the problem
""Also, (mathrm{xa = yb})""
  • Critical equation showing equal contestant numbers
  • Inference: This allows relating squad sizes: (mathrm{b = frac{x}{y}a})
  • Linkage to Source A: This equation captures the ""same number of contestants"" constraint from the problem statement
""the ratio of the total number of contestants...is (frac{mathrm{xa+yb}}{mathrm{a+b}})""
  • Formula for overall participation rate
  • Inference: Numerator is total contestants, denominator is total members
  • Linkage to Source A: This directly answers the question posed in the problem
""which is equal to (frac{mathrm{2xa}}{mathrm{a+(frac{x}{y})a}})""
  • Simplified form using the constraint (mathrm{xa = yb})
  • Inference: Answer expressed solely in terms of (mathrm{x, y}), and (mathrm{a}) (which cancels out)

Summary: Source B derives the mathematical solution showing that the overall participation rate equals (frac{mathrm{xa+yb}}{mathrm{a+b}}), which can be simplified using the equal-contestants constraint from Source A.


Understanding Source C: Table

  • What the table shows: A 5×5 grid displaying calculated values of (frac{mathrm{xa+yb}}{mathrm{a+b}}) for different combinations of (mathrm{x}) and (mathrm{y}) values
  • Key patterns observed:
    • Diagonal entries (where (mathrm{x=y})) show values: (frac{1}{4}), (frac{1}{3}), (frac{1}{2}), (frac{2}{3}), (frac{3}{4})
    • ""n/p"" entries appear at opposite corners: ((frac{1}{4}, frac{3}{4}))) and ((frac{3}{4}, frac{1}{4})))
    • All values range between (frac{1}{4}) and (frac{3}{4})
  • Linkage insights:
    • To Source A: The table provides practical answers to the problem's question for specific (mathrm{x}) and (mathrm{y}) values
    • To Source B: The table contains pre-calculated results using the formula (frac{mathrm{xa+yb}}{mathrm{a+b}}), and the ""n/p"" entries occur where the constraint (mathrm{xa=yb}) cannot be satisfied with reasonable squad sizes
  • Key findings:
    • When participation rates are equal ((mathrm{x=y})), the overall rate equals that same rate
    • Certain (mathrm{x,y}) combinations marked ""n/p"" cannot satisfy the equal-contestants constraint with integer squad sizes

Summary: Source C provides a lookup table for the formula derived in Source B, showing that certain participation rate combinations are impossible due to the equal-contestants constraint from Source A.


Overall Summary

  • The wrestling competition problem requires equal numbers of contestants from each squad, creating the mathematical constraint (mathrm{xa = yb})
  • This constraint allows us to derive a formula for overall participation rate: (frac{mathrm{xa+yb}}{mathrm{a+b}})
  • The lookup table reveals:
    • When squads have equal participation rates, the overall rate equals that same rate
    • Certain combinations (like (frac{1}{4}) and (frac{3}{4})) are impossible because they can't satisfy the equal-contestants requirement with integer squad sizes
    • The overall participation rate is always bounded by the individual squad rates

Question Analysis

  • Goal: Find which mathematical operation transforms the expression (frac{2xa}{a+frac{x}{y}a}) into an expression involving only x and y variables, eliminating 'a'
  • Key constraints:
    • Must eliminate variable 'a'
    • Result must be expressed only in terms of x and y
    • Result should represent the proportion of contestants
  • Answer type needed: Identification of the correct algebraic manipulation procedure

Connecting to Our Passage Analysis

  • Analyzing each proposed procedure to determine whether it simplifies the expression to one involving only x and y, without 'a'
  • Can be answered from analysis alone through algebraic manipulation of the given expression

Statement Evaluations

Statement 1 Analysis

""Multiply both the numerator and denominator by a.""

  • Calculation: (frac{2xa cdot a}{(a + frac{x}{y}a) cdot a} = frac{2xa^2}{a^2 + frac{x}{y}a^2})
  • Result: Still contains 'a' and fails to eliminate the variable
  • Conclusion: INCORRECT

Statement 2 Analysis

""Multiply both the numerator and denominator by y.""

  • Calculation: (frac{2xa cdot y}{(a + frac{x}{y}a) cdot y} = frac{2xay}{ay + xa} = frac{2xy}{x + y})
  • Result: Successfully removes 'a' from expression
  • Conclusion: CORRECT

Statement 3 Analysis

""Divide both the numerator and denominator by a.""

  • Calculation: (frac{2xa / a}{(a + frac{x}{y}a) / a} = frac{2x}{1 + frac{x}{y}} = frac{2xy}{x + y})
  • Result: Successfully removes 'a' from expression
  • Conclusion: CORRECT

Statement 4 Analysis

""Subtract a and then divide the result a + (x/y)a.""

  • This statement is unclear and does not represent a valid algebraic operation on the given expression
  • Conclusion: INCORRECT

Statement 5 Analysis

""Divide by a + (x/y)a and then subtract a from the result.""

  • This statement describes a sequence of operations that would not eliminate 'a' from the expression
  • Conclusion: INCORRECT

Verification

  • Options 2 and 3 both simplify the expression to (frac{2xy}{x + y}), eliminating 'a'
  • Option 1 keeps 'a' in the expression and therefore fails the requirement
  • Option 3 (division by 'a') is the most straightforward and standard method to remove the variable

Answer

Option 3

Answer Choices Explained
A

Multiply both the numerator and denominator by a.

B

Multiply both the numerator and denominator by y.

C

Divide both the numerator and denominator by a.

C
D

Subtract a and then divide the result \(\mathrm{a + (x/y)a}\).

E

Divide by \(\mathrm{a + (x/y)a}\) and then subtract a from the result.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.