Loading...
Tim can buy a certain computer for $800 at a local store, or he can buy the same computer for $800 from a catalog. The sales tax charged by the store is \(\mathrm{s}\) percent and the sales tax charged by the catalog is \(\mathrm{c}\) percent. If \(\mathrm{s > c}\), how much more sales tax will Tim pay if he buys the computer at the store instead of from the catalog?
We need to find the exact dollar difference in sales tax between buying an \(\$800\) computer at a store versus from a catalog.
Since we're comparing tax amounts on the same \(\$800\) purchase, the key insight is this: we need to determine if we can find a unique value for the tax difference in dollars.
For this value question to be sufficient, we must arrive at exactly one numerical answer.
Statement 1 tells us: \(\mathrm{s} = 2\mathrm{c}\)
This means the store tax rate is exactly double the catalog tax rate. But here's the critical question: what ARE these actual rates?
Let's test with concrete examples:
Since different values of c lead to different tax differences, we cannot determine a unique answer.
Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choices A and D.
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2 tells us: \(\mathrm{s} = \mathrm{c} + 3\)
This means the store tax rate is exactly 3 percentage points higher than the catalog tax rate.
Here's the elegant insight: When the base amount is fixed at \(\$800\), a fixed percentage point difference always yields the same dollar difference, regardless of the actual tax rates.
The tax difference = \(\$800 \times (\mathrm{s\%} - \mathrm{c\%}) = \$800 \times 3\% = \$24\)
To verify this works for any value of c:
The difference is always \(\$24\), no matter what c is.
Statement 2 is sufficient. [STOP - Sufficient!]
This eliminates choices C and E.
Since Statement 2 alone gives us a unique value for the tax difference (\(\$24\)) while Statement 1 alone does not, the answer is B.
Answer Choice B: "Statement 2 alone is sufficient, but Statement 1 alone is not sufficient."