Loading...
The rate \(\mathrm{R}\) at which a chemical reaction in a certain industrial process proceeds is a function of time \(\mathrm{t}\) and is given by \(\mathrm{R} = \mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3 + \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t}^2 + \mathrm{c}\), where \(\mathrm{a}\), \(\mathrm{b}\), and \(\mathrm{c}\) are constants and \(\mathrm{t} > 0\). Is there a positive value of \(\mathrm{t}\) for which \(\mathrm{R} = 0\)?
We need to determine if there exists a positive value of t such that \(\mathrm{R} = 0\), where \(\mathrm{R} = \mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3 + \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t}^2 + \mathrm{c}\).
This is a yes/no question about whether the cubic function R ever crosses the horizontal axis for positive values of t.
What "sufficient" means here: We need enough information to give a definitive YES or NO answer. Either we can prove a positive root exists (YES) or we can prove no positive root exists (NO).
Given information:
Key insight: For a continuous function to equal zero, it must cross the horizontal axis. This happens when the function has different signs at different points. Since we're looking at \(\mathrm{t} > 0\):
Statement 1 tells us: \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\)
This gives us the relative relationship between a and b, but crucially, we don't know their individual signs. Let's test different scenarios:
Scenario 1: \(\mathrm{a} = 2\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\) (both a and b positive)
Scenario 2: \(\mathrm{a} = 1\), \(\mathrm{b} = -2\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\) (a positive, b negative)
Without knowing the sign of c or the specific signs of a and b, we get different possible answers (YES in Scenario 2, NO in Scenario 1).
Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choices A and D.
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2 tells us: \(\mathrm{c} > 0\)
This means when t is very close to \(0^+\), \(\mathrm{R} \approx \mathrm{c}\) which is positive. But what happens as t increases depends entirely on the unknown values of a and b.
Scenario 1: \(\mathrm{a} = 1\), \(\mathrm{b} = 0\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
Scenario 2: \(\mathrm{a} = -1\), \(\mathrm{b} = 0\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
Different values of a lead to different answers about whether \(\mathrm{R} = 0\) has a positive solution.
Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choices B and D (already eliminated).
Using both statements together, we know:
The key question remains: What is the sign of a?
Case 1: If a > 0 (which allows \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\) regardless of b's sign)
Case 2: If a < 0 but still a > b (meaning b is even more negative)
Let's verify with concrete examples:
Example with no positive root: \(\mathrm{a} = 2\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
Example with a positive root: \(\mathrm{a} = -1\), \(\mathrm{b} = -2\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
Since we can construct valid scenarios that give different answers, the statements together are NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choices C.
Even with both pieces of information, we cannot definitively answer whether \(\mathrm{R} = 0\) has a positive solution because the sign of a remains undetermined, and this is crucial for determining the function's behavior as t increases.
Answer Choice E: "The statements together are not sufficient."