The rate R at which a chemical reaction in a certain industrial process proceeds is a function of time t...
GMAT Data Sufficiency : (DS) Questions
The rate \(\mathrm{R}\) at which a chemical reaction in a certain industrial process proceeds is a function of time \(\mathrm{t}\) and is given by \(\mathrm{R} = \mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3 + \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t}^2 + \mathrm{c}\), where \(\mathrm{a}\), \(\mathrm{b}\), and \(\mathrm{c}\) are constants and \(\mathrm{t} > 0\). Is there a positive value of \(\mathrm{t}\) for which \(\mathrm{R} = 0\)?
- \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\)
- \(\mathrm{c} > 0\)
Understanding the Question
We need to determine if there exists a positive value of t such that \(\mathrm{R} = 0\), where \(\mathrm{R} = \mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3 + \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t}^2 + \mathrm{c}\).
This is a yes/no question about whether the cubic function R ever crosses the horizontal axis for positive values of t.
What "sufficient" means here: We need enough information to give a definitive YES or NO answer. Either we can prove a positive root exists (YES) or we can prove no positive root exists (NO).
Given information:
- \(\mathrm{R} = \mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3 + \mathrm{b}\mathrm{t}^2 + \mathrm{c}\) (cubic function)
- a, b, and c are constants
- \(\mathrm{t} > 0\) (we only consider positive values)
Key insight: For a continuous function to equal zero, it must cross the horizontal axis. This happens when the function has different signs at different points. Since we're looking at \(\mathrm{t} > 0\):
- As t approaches \(0^+\), R approaches c
- As t approaches infinity, R's sign is dominated by \(\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3\)
Analyzing Statement 1
Statement 1 tells us: \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\)
This gives us the relative relationship between a and b, but crucially, we don't know their individual signs. Let's test different scenarios:
Scenario 1: \(\mathrm{a} = 2\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\) (both a and b positive)
- Near \(\mathrm{t} = 0\): \(\mathrm{R} \approx 1\) (positive)
- For large t: R is dominated by \(2\mathrm{t}^3\) (positive)
- Since R stays positive throughout, no zero exists ✗
Scenario 2: \(\mathrm{a} = 1\), \(\mathrm{b} = -2\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\) (a positive, b negative)
- Near \(\mathrm{t} = 0\): \(\mathrm{R} \approx 1\) (positive)
- For large t: R is dominated by \(\mathrm{t}^3\) (positive)
- But the negative \(\mathrm{b}\mathrm{t}^2\) term creates a dip. Let's check: At \(\mathrm{t} = 1\), \(\mathrm{R} = 1 - 2 + 1 = 0\)
- A zero exists at t = 1 ✓
Without knowing the sign of c or the specific signs of a and b, we get different possible answers (YES in Scenario 2, NO in Scenario 1).
Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choices A and D.
Analyzing Statement 2
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2 tells us: \(\mathrm{c} > 0\)
This means when t is very close to \(0^+\), \(\mathrm{R} \approx \mathrm{c}\) which is positive. But what happens as t increases depends entirely on the unknown values of a and b.
Scenario 1: \(\mathrm{a} = 1\), \(\mathrm{b} = 0\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
- \(\mathrm{R} = \mathrm{t}^3 + 1\)
- Since \(\mathrm{t}^3 > 0\) for all \(\mathrm{t} > 0\), we have \(\mathrm{R} > 1\) for all positive t
- No zero exists ✗
Scenario 2: \(\mathrm{a} = -1\), \(\mathrm{b} = 0\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
- \(\mathrm{R} = -\mathrm{t}^3 + 1\)
- Near \(\mathrm{t} = 0\): \(\mathrm{R} \approx 1\) (positive)
- At \(\mathrm{t} = 1\): \(\mathrm{R} = -1 + 1 = 0\)
- For large t: R becomes negative
- Since R is continuous and changes from positive to negative, it must cross zero ✓
Different values of a lead to different answers about whether \(\mathrm{R} = 0\) has a positive solution.
Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choices B and D (already eliminated).
Combining Statements
Using both statements together, we know:
- \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\)
- \(\mathrm{c} > 0\)
The key question remains: What is the sign of a?
Case 1: If a > 0 (which allows \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\) regardless of b's sign)
- Near \(\mathrm{t} = 0\): \(\mathrm{R} \approx \mathrm{c} > 0\) (positive)
- For large t: R is dominated by \(\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3 > 0\) (positive)
- Even with a negative b term, if \(\mathrm{a} > 0\), the positive \(\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3\) term eventually dominates
- Example: \(\mathrm{a} = 3\), \(\mathrm{b} = -1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
- \(\mathrm{R} = 3\mathrm{t}^3 - \mathrm{t}^2 + 1\)
- At \(\mathrm{t} = 0.5\): \(\mathrm{R} = 3(0.125) - 0.25 + 1 = 0.375 - 0.25 + 1 = 1.125 > 0\)
- The function might dip but stays positive for all \(\mathrm{t} > 0\)
Case 2: If a < 0 but still a > b (meaning b is even more negative)
- Near \(\mathrm{t} = 0\): \(\mathrm{R} \approx \mathrm{c} > 0\) (positive)
- For large t: R is dominated by \(\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}^3 < 0\) (negative)
- Since R starts positive and ends negative, it must cross zero ✓
Let's verify with concrete examples:
Example with no positive root: \(\mathrm{a} = 2\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
- Satisfies \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\) (2 > 1) ✓ and \(\mathrm{c} > 0\) ✓
- \(\mathrm{R} = 2\mathrm{t}^3 + \mathrm{t}^2 + 1\)
- All positive terms mean \(\mathrm{R} > 1\) for all \(\mathrm{t} > 0\)
- Answer: NO
Example with a positive root: \(\mathrm{a} = -1\), \(\mathrm{b} = -2\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
- Satisfies \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{b}\) (-1 > -2) ✓ and \(\mathrm{c} > 0\) ✓
- \(\mathrm{R} = -\mathrm{t}^3 - 2\mathrm{t}^2 + 1\)
- At \(\mathrm{t} = 0.5\): \(\mathrm{R} = -0.125 - 0.5 + 1 = 0.375 > 0\)
- At \(\mathrm{t} = 1\): \(\mathrm{R} = -1 - 2 + 1 = -2 < 0\)
- R crosses zero between \(\mathrm{t} = 0.5\) and \(\mathrm{t} = 1\)
- Answer: YES
Since we can construct valid scenarios that give different answers, the statements together are NOT sufficient.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choices C.
The Answer: E
Even with both pieces of information, we cannot definitively answer whether \(\mathrm{R} = 0\) has a positive solution because the sign of a remains undetermined, and this is crucial for determining the function's behavior as t increases.
Answer Choice E: "The statements together are not sufficient."