The graph shows the estimated total elephant population in each of 4 regions of India for each of 4 different...
GMAT Graphics Interpretation : (GI) Questions

The graph shows the estimated total elephant population in each of 4 regions of India for each of 4 different years.
Select from the drop-down menus the options that create the statement that most accurately reflects the information provided.
Owning The Dataset
Table 1: Text Analysis
Text Component | Literal Content | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Subject Matter | estimated total elephant population | Data is about rough counts of elephants |
Geographic Coverage | in each of 4 regions of India | Covers four named regions in India |
Time Coverage | for each of 4 different years | Data is measured at four distinct years |
Nature of Data | estimated | Numbers are estimates, not precise measurements |
Table 2: Chart Analysis
Chart Feature | What It Shows | Analysis |
---|---|---|
Chart Type | Grouped bar chart (4 regions, 4 years per region) | Allows region-to-region and year-to-year comparisons |
X-axis | Regions: east-central, northeastern, northern, southern | Geographical distinction of elephant populations |
Y-axis | Elephant population, 0 to about \(\mathrm{16,000}\) | Supports comparison of populations among regions and over years |
Series (Bar Groups) | One bar per region per year: 1993, 1997, 2002, 2007 | Shows population change over time for each region |
Trend Patterns | Northeastern decreases; others increase | Indicates declining population only in northeastern region |
Key Insights
- The northeastern region is the only one with a consistent decline in estimated elephant population from 1993 (\(\mathrm{11,000}\)) to 2007 (\(\mathrm{8,700}\)), a decrease of roughly \(\mathrm{20\%}\).
- The southern region has the highest elephant population throughout and shows steady growth, reaching \(\mathrm{14,000}\) in 2007.
- East-central and northern regions start lower and both gradually increase; no other region shows a decline.
- Thus, the dataset highlights a geographic disparity: only the northeastern region is facing a shrinking elephant population over the period shown.
Step-by-Step Solution
Question 1: Identifying the Region with Decreasing Population
Complete Statement:
From 1993 to 2007, the estimated total elephant population in the [BLANK 1] region decreased by [BLANK 2] percent, to the nearest 10 percent.
Breaking Down the Statement
- Statement Breakdown 1:
- Key Phrase: From 1993 to 2007
- Meaning: This specifies the time range to consider: compare values from 1993 and 2007.
- Relation to Chart: Locate and compare the first and last data points (bars) for each region.
- Important Implications: Only the 1993 and 2007 data are relevant; ignore other years.
- Statement Breakdown 2:
- Key Phrase: estimated total elephant population...decreased
- Meaning: Find a region where the population in 2007 is lower than in 1993.
- Relation to Chart: Look for a region with a last bar lower than the first bar.
- Important Implications: Only regions with a decrease in population can be correct.
- What is needed: Which of the listed regions showed a decrease in estimated elephant population from 1993 to 2007.
Solution:
- Condensed Solution Implementation:
Check the population changes for each region from 1993 to 2007 to determine where there was a decrease. - Necessary Data points:
East-central: \(\mathrm{2,200}\) (1993) to \(\mathrm{2,600}\) (2007); Northeastern: \(\mathrm{11,000}\) (1993) to \(\mathrm{8,700}\) (2007); Northern: \(\mathrm{900}\) (1993) to \(\mathrm{1,800}\) (2007); Southern: \(\mathrm{11,200}\) (1993) to \(\mathrm{14,000}\) (2007). - Calculations Estimations:
Compare each region's population in 1993 and 2007. Only the northeastern region shows a decrease, from \(\mathrm{11,000}\) to \(\mathrm{8,700}\). - Comparison to Answer Choices:
Among choices, only 'northeastern' matches the decrease condition.
FINAL ANSWER Blank 1: northeastern
Question 2: Calculating the Percentage Decrease
Complete Statement:
From 1993 to 2007, the estimated total elephant population in the northeastern region decreased by [BLANK 2] percent, to the nearest 10 percent.
Breaking Down the Statement
- Statement Breakdown 1:
- Key Phrase: decreased by [BLANK 2] percent
- Meaning: Find the percent decrease from the 1993 value to the 2007 value.
- Relation to Chart: Use northeastern region data for 1993 and 2007.
- Statement Breakdown 2:
- Key Phrase: to the nearest 10 percent
- Meaning: Round the calculated percent decrease to the nearest \(\mathrm{10\%}\).
- Relation to Chart: No exact value needed; approximate rounding is acceptable.
- What is needed: The percent decrease in the northeastern region's elephant population from 1993 to 2007, rounded to the nearest \(\mathrm{10\%}\).
Solution:
- Condensed Solution Implementation:
Calculate percent decrease using the formula: \(\mathrm{\frac{original - new}{original} \times 100\%}\). - Necessary Data points:
Northeastern region: \(\mathrm{11,000}\) (1993); \(\mathrm{8,700}\) (2007). - Calculations Estimations:
Decrease = \(\mathrm{11,000 - 8,700 = 2,300}\). Percent decrease = \(\mathrm{2,300 / 11,000 ≈ 0.209 ≈ 21\%}\). Rounded to nearest \(\mathrm{10\%}\), answer is \(\mathrm{20\%}\). - Comparison to Answer Choices:
Possible choices: 20, 30, 40. \(\mathrm{21\%}\) rounds to \(\mathrm{20\%}\).
FINAL ANSWER Blank 2: 20
Summary
The northeastern region is the only one where the estimated elephant population decreased from 1993 to 2007. The population dropped from \(\mathrm{11,000}\) to \(\mathrm{8,700}\), a decrease of about \(\mathrm{21\%}\), which rounds to \(\mathrm{20\%}\) to the nearest 10 percent.
Question Independence Analysis
The two questions are dependent: You must identify the correct region in Blank 1 before you can calculate the percent decrease for Blank 2.