e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Speaker: A certain ethical theory holds that everyone has six fundamental duties: to avoid causing harm to others, to promote...

GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions

Source: Mock
Two Part Analysis
Verbal - RC
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Speaker: A certain ethical theory holds that everyone has six fundamental duties: to avoid causing harm to others, to promote the common good, to act honorably, to be fair, to obey authority, and to be loyal. According to the theory, when these duties conflict, avoiding causing harm to others is more important than being fair or acting honorably, and being fair is more important than obeying authority. Promoting the common good is more important than being loyal but is less important than acting honorably or obeying authority.

Statement: The speaker's statements do NOT indicate that the duty to __1 is ever less important than any of other duties, and the statements do NOT indicate that the duty to 2__ is ever more important than any of the other duties. Select for 1 and 2 the options that complete the statement so that it is most accurate based on the information provided. Make only two selections, one in each column.

1

2

avoid causing harm to others

promote the common good

act honorably

be fair

obey authority

be loyal

Solution

Phase 1: Owning the Dataset

Argument Analysis Table

Passage Statement Analysis & Implications
"everyone has six fundamental duties: to avoid causing harm to others, to promote the common good, to act honorably, to be fair, to obey authority, and to be loyal"
  • Core Fact: Establishes 6 specific duties
  • Visualization: We have exactly 6 duties to track
  • Logical Connections: Sets up framework for comparisons
  • What We Can Conclude: All relationships will involve these 6 duties
"avoiding causing harm to others is more important than being fair or acting honorably"
  • Core Fact: Harm avoidance > fairness AND harm avoidance > honor
  • Visualization: Harm avoidance ranks above at least 2 other duties
  • Logical Connections: Establishes harm avoidance as high priority
  • What We Can Conclude: Harm avoidance outranks multiple duties
"being fair is more important than obeying authority"
  • Core Fact: Fairness > authority obedience
  • Visualization: Creates a ranking chain
  • Logical Connections: Combined with above, we get harm avoidance > fairness > authority
  • What We Can Conclude: Authority obedience ranks below at least 2 duties
"Promoting the common good is more important than being loyal but is less important than acting honorably or obeying authority"
  • Core Fact: Common good > loyalty AND honor > common good AND authority > common good
  • Visualization: Common good sits in middle of hierarchy
  • Logical Connections: Creates complex web of relationships
  • What We Can Conclude: Common good has both higher and lower ranked duties

Key Patterns Identified

  • Established Rankings: We have explicit "greater than" relationships between specific duties
  • Ranking Chains: Some duties create chains (e.g., harm avoidance > fairness > authority)
  • No Universal Statements: The passage doesn't say any duty is always most/least important
  • Limited Information: We only know the specific relationships stated, not all possible comparisons

Phase 2: Question Analysis & Prethinking

Understanding Each Part

  • Part 1 Focus: Find a duty that is NEVER stated to be less important than another
  • Part 2 Focus: Find a duty that is NEVER stated to be more important than another
  • Relationship: These represent the extremes - one duty with no stated superiors, one with no stated inferiors

Valid Inferences (Prethinking)

Let me map what we know about each duty:

Avoid causing harm:
- More important than: fairness, acting honorably
- Less important than: (none stated)

Be loyal:
- More important than: (none stated)
- Less important than: promoting common good

Other duties all have both higher and lower ranked duties stated.

Phase 3: Answer Choice Evaluation

Evaluating Each Option

"avoid causing harm to others"

  • What it claims: This duty as an answer
  • Fact Support: Stated to be more important than fairness and honor; NO statement says anything is more important than it
  • Logical Validity: Valid for Part 1 - never stated to be less important
  • Part Suitability: Perfect for Part 1, not for Part 2

"be loyal"

  • What it claims: This duty as an answer
  • Fact Support: Stated to be less important than common good; NO statement says it's more important than anything
  • Logical Validity: Valid for Part 2 - never stated to be more important
  • Part Suitability: Perfect for Part 2, not for Part 1

Other options (promote common good, act honorably, be fair, obey authority):

  • All have explicit statements showing them both more AND less important than other duties
  • Cannot work for either part

Answer Selection Process

  1. Part 1 Selection: "avoid causing harm to others" - Only duty with no stated superiors
  2. Part 2 Selection: "be loyal" - Only duty with no stated inferiors
  3. Verification: Both answers rely solely on explicit passage statements without speculation

Trap Avoidance Check

  • ✓ No over-inference - we only use stated relationships
  • ✓ No assumptions about unstated comparisons
  • ✓ Each answer is independently valid
  • ✓ The pair completely addresses both parts of the question
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.