Loading...
Should the choices made by 100 participants in a survey about Product X be said to proportionately represent the preferences of the entire population?
We need to determine whether a 100-person survey about Product X can be said to "proportionately represent" the entire population's preferences. This is a yes/no question: Can we definitively answer either YES (it does proportionately represent) or NO (it doesn't)?
To have sufficient information, we need to be able to give a definitive YES or NO answer about whether this survey proportionately represents the population.
For a survey to proportionately represent a population, we typically need to know:
Without this information, we cannot determine representativeness.
Statement 1 tells us: In the survey of 100 participants, 70% said they preferred Product X.
This gives us the survey result, but notice what's missing:
The 70% preference rate is just an outcome—it tells us nothing about whether this outcome proportionately represents the population. For example:
Without methodology information, we cannot answer YES or NO definitively.
[STOP - NOT Sufficient!]
Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choices A and D.
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2 tells us: While the survey provided valuable insights into Product X, the small sample may not be representative of the entire population's preferences.
Let's parse this statement carefully. The key phrase is "may not be" representative. This is crucial because:
This ambiguous language prevents us from answering:
The statement raises a concern about sample size but doesn't resolve whether the survey actually represents the population or not.
[STOP - NOT Sufficient!]
Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choice B (we already eliminated D).
Using both statements together, we have:
Even combining both pieces of information, we still face the fundamental problem: ambiguity remains. Consider what we still don't know:
The phrase "may not be representative" in Statement 2 continues to prevent any definitive conclusion. We cannot say with certainty:
[STOP - NOT Sufficient!]
Statements 1 and 2 together are NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choice C (we already eliminated A, B, and D).
Neither statement alone nor both together provide enough information to definitively answer whether the survey proportionately represents the population's preferences. The ambiguous language in Statement 2 ("may not be") combined with the lack of methodology information prevents any definitive YES or NO conclusion.
Answer Choice E: "The statements together are not sufficient."