e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Researchers studying long-term changes in regional mouse populations have found that by focusing on the populations of a rare but...

GMAT Multi Source Reasoning : (MSR) Questions

Source: Mock
Multi Source Reasoning
Case Study
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query
Research Study
Data Tables

Researchers studying long-term changes in regional mouse populations have found that by focusing on the populations of a rare but widespread and easily identifiable species of mouse (Species X), they can make fairly accurate estimations about the total regional mouse populations.

In a report on a recent study that included the data tables that follow, the researchers provided some addenda:

  1. The Species X population of Region CV increased by 123,995 between 1990 and 2005.
  2. In contrast, the Species X population of Region EW declined by about 52% during that same time.
Ques. 1/3

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is accurate based on the information in the passage and tables. Otherwise, select No.

A
Yes
No

The total mouse population of TY changed more from 1960 to 1975 than from 1975 to 1990.

B
Yes
No

Rounded to the nearest million, the total mouse population of TY was 47 million in 1990.

C
Yes
No

The total mouse population of TY fell from 1975 to 1990.

Solution

Owning the Dataset

Understanding Source A: Text Source - Research Study

Information from Dataset Analysis
""Researchers studying long-term changes in regional mouse populations have found that by focusing on the populations of a rare but widespread and easily identifiable species of mouse (Species X), they can make fairly accurate estimations about the total regional mouse populations.""
  • Species X serves as an indicator species for tracking overall mouse populations
  • Three key characteristics: rare, widespread, and easily identifiable
  • Relationship consistency: The connection between Species X and total populations allows ""fairly accurate"" estimates
""The Species X population of Region CV increased by 123,995 between 1990 and 2005.""
  • CV region experienced significant growth in Species X
  • Precise tracking methods suggested by the specific number (123,995)
  • Timeframe: 15-year measurement period (1990-2005)
""In contrast, the Species X population of Region EW declined by about 52% during that same time.""
  • EW region experienced major population decline
  • Approximation: Use of ""about"" suggests estimate rather than exact figure
  • Opposite trends: CV and EW regions had contrasting population patterns
  • Summary: Research study establishes Species X as a reliable indicator for total mouse populations, with specific examples showing CV region growth and EW region decline between 1990-2005

Understanding Source B: Data Tables - Species X Population Data

  • Table Contents:
    • Two tables presenting Species X population data across six regions (CV, EW, IQ, JR, PS, TY)
    • Three time periods covered: 1960, 1975, 1990
    • First table: Absolute population numbers
    • Second table: Species X as percentage of total mouse population
  • Key Patterns:
    • Species X populations range from 20,760 (JR, 1990) to 1,859,460 (IQ, 1960)
    • IQ region: Dramatic continuous decline: 1,859,460 → 928,340 → 465,610
    • EW region: Stability then growth: 393,260 → 392,080 → 964,020
    • Most regions show declining percentages over time
  • Species Rarity Confirmed: Never exceeds 4% of total mouse population (highest: TY at 3.356% in 1960)
  • EW Growth Pattern: Only region showing significant growth by 1990, more than doubling between 1975-1990
  • Continuous Coverage: Source B data ends in 1990, exactly where Source A's timeframe begins (1990-2005), providing 45-year coverage
  • Regional Population Peaks: EW shows opposite trends - growth through 1990 in Source B, then 52% decline after 1990 in Source A
  • Summary: Historical data reveals highly variable Species X populations across regions, with most experiencing declines except EW which grew dramatically before 1990, confirming Species X's rarity and validating its use as an indicator species

Overall Summary

  • Data Coverage: Nearly half a century of continuous Species X population data (1960-2005)
  • Rarity Confirmation: Species X consistently represents less than 4% of total mouse populations
  • EW Population Peak: Around 1990 - growing dramatically before then declining sharply after
  • Accuracy Level: Percentage variation (0.255% to 3.356%) explains why estimates are ""fairly accurate"" rather than precise
  • Methodology Validation: Sources together validate using this rare species to estimate total mouse populations across regions

Question Analysis

  • Task: Evaluate three statements about the total mouse population of the TY region across different time periods
  • Requirements:
    • Must evaluate each statement as Yes or No
    • Focus specifically on TY region
    • Statements concern TOTAL mouse population, not just Species X
    • Need to calculate total populations from Species X data and percentages
  • Answer Type: Numerical calculation and verification of claims about population changes

Connecting to Our Passage Analysis

  • Calculation Required: The analysis doesn't directly address total mouse populations for TY region - must calculate from Species X population and percentage data in Source B tables
  • Formula: Total Population = Species X Population ÷ (Percentage ÷ 100)
  • Source: Cannot answer from analysis alone - requires calculation using Source B data

Extracting Relevant Findings

  • TY Region Data from Source B:
    • Species X populations: 1960: 947,630; 1975: 144,520; 1990: 968,460
    • Percentages: 1960: 3.356%; 1975: 0.351%; 1990: 2.051%

Statement 1 Evaluation

  • Question: Did TY's total mouse population change more between 1960-1975 than between 1975-1990?
  • Calculations:
    • 1960 total: 947,630 ÷ 0.03356 = 28,236,423
    • 1975 total: 144,520 ÷ 0.00351 = 41,188,034
    • 1990 total: 968,460 ÷ 0.02051 = 47,219,893
  • Change 1960-1975: From 28,236,423 to 41,188,034 = increase of 12,951,611
  • Change 1975-1990: From 41,188,034 to 47,219,893 = increase of 6,031,859
  • Result: 12,951,611 > 6,031,859
  • YES - The population changed more (~13 million increase) from 1960-1975 than from 1975-1990 (~6 million increase)

Statement 2 Evaluation

  • Question: Was TY's total mouse population 47 million in 1990 when rounded to the nearest million?
  • 1990 total population: 968,460 ÷ 0.02051 = 47,219,893
  • Rounded to nearest million: 47,000,000
  • YES - The 1990 population of 47,219,893 rounds to 47 million

Statement 3 Evaluation

  • Question: Did TY's total mouse population decrease from 1975 to 1990?
  • 1975 population: 41,188,034
  • 1990 population: 47,219,893
  • Comparison: 47,219,893 > 41,188,034 (increased, not decreased)
  • NO - The population INCREASED from 41.2 million to 47.2 million, not fell

Calculation Verification

  • Formula Check: Species X population divided by percentage as decimal
    • 1960: 947,630 ÷ 0.03356 = 28,236,423
    • 1975: 144,520 ÷ 0.00351 = 41,188,034
    • 1990: 968,460 ÷ 0.02051 = 47,219,893
  • All three statements evaluated using calculated totals
  • Final Answer: Yes, Yes, No
Answer Choices Explained
A
Yes
No

The total mouse population of TY changed more from 1960 to 1975 than from 1975 to 1990.

B
Yes
No

Rounded to the nearest million, the total mouse population of TY was 47 million in 1990.

C
Yes
No

The total mouse population of TY fell from 1975 to 1990.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.