Researchers: Ethicists (philosophers of ethics) devote their careers to reflecting on morality and presumably care deeply about it. Moral reflection...

GMAT Multi Source Reasoning : (MSR) Questions

Source: Official Guide

Multi Source Reasoning

Case Study

MEDIUM

...

Notes

Post a Query

Survey

Results

Response Distribution

Researchers: Ethicists (philosophers of ethics) devote their careers to reflecting on morality and presumably care deeply about it. Moral reflection tends to promote moral behavior, and ethicists tend to be both more prone to and more skilled at moral reflection than non-ethicists. Given that the philosophical ethical theories of ethicists broadly agree with widely accepted moral standards, we expect that ethicists would tend to be better behaved than non-ethicists with regard to widely accepted moral standards.

To test this expectation we conducted a survey of attendees of a philosophical conference to assess whether people who have contact with ethicists believe that ethicists are, indeed, particularly well-behaved with regard to widely accepted moral standards. The attendees—each among exactly one of the categories of ethicist, other philosophers (non-ethicists), and non-academics—were asked to evaluate the moral behavior of ethicists as compared to that of other philosophers and non-academics.

Ques. 1/3

For each of the following statements about the respondents to the survey, select Yes if it accurately reflects the information provided. Otherwise, select No.

Yes

The majority of philosophers who responded to the survey were ethicists.

Yes

The majority of people who responded to the survey were not ethicists.

Yes

The majority of people who responded to the survey were philosophers.

Solution

OWNING THE DATASET

Understanding Source A: Survey - Research Study Description

Information from Dataset	Analysis
"Ethicists (philosophers of ethics) devote their careers to reflecting on morality and presumably care deeply about it."	Ethicists are professional moral philosophers who focus their work on ethics Inference: Suggests they have significant investment in moral questions
"Moral reflection tends to promote moral behavior, and ethicists tend to be both more prone to and more skilled at moral reflection than non-ethicists."	The researchers believe thinking about morality leads to better moral behavior Ethicists do more moral thinking and are better at it than others Inference: States the researchers' core assumption linking reflection to behavior
"we expect that ethicists would tend to be better behaved than non-ethicists with regard to widely accepted moral standards"	The researchers predict ethicists will act more morally than others They focus on common moral standards, not specialized ethical theories Inference: Reveals the researchers' hypothesis
"conducted a survey of attendees of a philosophical conference"	Data was collected at an academic conference Inference: Sample likely includes people familiar with academic philosophy
"attendees—each among exactly one of the categories of ethicist, other philosophers (non-ethicists), and non-academics"	Survey participants were divided into three distinct groups with no overlap Inference: Clear categorization of survey participants

Summary: Researchers surveyed conference attendees to test whether ethicists (professional moral philosophers) are perceived as more morally well-behaved than other philosophers and non-academics.

Understanding Source B: Results - Average Ratings Table

Information from Dataset	Analysis
"7-point scale where...1 means ethicists' moral behavior is substantially better, 4 means ethicists' moral behavior is about the same, and 7 means ethicists' moral behavior is substantially worse"	Lower numbers = better moral behavior 4 = no difference between groups Higher numbers = worse moral behavior Inference: Scale allows for nuanced rating of perceived differences
"values...indicate the average (arithmetic mean) of the ratings"	Numbers in the table are averages of all responses Inference: Results are aggregated as simple averages
Ethicists rate themselves: 3.4 vs other philosophers, 3.1 vs non-academics	Ethicists think they behave better than both other groups (ratings below 4) They see a bigger moral gap between themselves and non-academics (3.1) than with other philosophers (3.4) Inference: Ethicists view themselves as somewhat better than both groups Linkage to Source A: Ethicists' self-perception matches what researchers predicted
Other philosophers rate ethicists: 4.0 vs themselves, 3.7 vs non-academics	Other philosophers see no moral difference between ethicists and themselves (4.0 = same) They think ethicists are slightly better than non-academics Inference: Other philosophers see no meaningful difference between ethicists and themselves Linkage to Source A: Other philosophers don't share the researchers' hypothesis about ethicists being better
Non-academics rate ethicists: 3.8 vs other philosophers, 4.0 vs non-academics	Non-academics think ethicists are slightly better than other philosophers They see no difference between ethicists and themselves (4.0 = same) Inference: Non-academics see no difference between ethicists and themselves

Summary: Average ratings reveal that ethicists rate themselves as morally superior to others, but other philosophers and non-academics largely see no meaningful differences—contradicting the researchers' expectation.

Understanding Source C: Response Distribution - Breakdown of Individual Responses

Information from Dataset	Analysis
"number of responses for each of the ranges of ratings: better (1–3), about the same (4), and worse (5–7)"	Responses grouped into three categories: better, same, worse Shows how responses were distributed, not just averages Inference: Provides more detail than just averages by showing distribution
Ethicists comparing to other philosophers: 12 better, 18 same, 4 worse	Most ethicists (18 of 34) see themselves as morally equal to other philosophers Only 4 think they're worse Inference: Shows generally positive self-assessment Linkage to Source B: Explains why the average was 3.4—most said "same" but more said "better" than "worse"
Other philosophers comparing ethicists to themselves: 15 better, 18 same, 14 worse	Nearly equal split across all three categories No consensus among other philosophers Inference: Responses nearly evenly split across all three categories Linkage to Source B: This even split explains the 4.0 average—equal numbers pulling in opposite directions
Ethicists comparing to non-academics: 19 better, 11 same, 4 worse	Clear majority (19 of 34) think they're better than non-academics Very few think they're worse Inference: Majority of ethicists see themselves as better than non-academics Linkage to Source B: Shows why average was lower (3.1)—more "better" responses
Other philosophers comparing ethicists to non-academics: 19 better, 17 same, 11 worse	More see ethicists as better than non-academics, but significant variation Inference: Other philosophers tend to see ethicists as better than non-academics Linkage to Source A: Even other philosophers somewhat agree that ethicists might be better than non-academics, partially supporting the hypothesis

Summary: The distribution data reveals that while ethicists consistently rate themselves favorably (matching researchers' expectations), other philosophers' neutral averages result from evenly split opinions, showing no consensus about ethicists' superior moral behavior.

Overall Summary

The survey reveals a striking self-perception bias: ethicists believe they are more moral than others (especially non-academics), aligning with researchers' hypothesis that moral reflection leads to better behavior.
However, this perception is not validated by external observers—other philosophers see no moral difference between themselves and ethicists (with opinions evenly split), while non-academics also see no difference.
The data suggests that professional expertise in moral philosophy does not translate to being perceived as more moral by others, challenging the assumption that studying ethics makes one more ethical in practice.

Question Analysis

We need to determine if three statements about the survey respondents are true or false based on the numerical breakdown of respondent categories. The analysis requires:

Determining 'majority' (more than 50%)
Working with three distinct respondent groups: ethicists, other philosophers, non-academics
Calculating proportions for each statement

This is a fact verification exercise through numerical calculation.

Connecting to Our Analysis

The analysis contains respondent numbers from Source B showing: Ethicists (34), Other philosophers (47), Non-academics (23). Total respondents = 104. All necessary numerical data is available in the analysis to answer the question completely.

Extracting Relevant Findings

Using respondent numbers from the collated analysis to calculate proportions and determine majority status for each statement. The key data points are:

Ethicists: 34 respondents
Other philosophers: 47 respondents
Non-academics: 23 respondents
Total respondents: 104
Total philosophers: \(\mathrm{34 + 47 = 81}\)

Individual Statement/Option Evaluations

Statement 1 Evaluation

Question: Were most philosophers in the survey ethicists?

Calculation: Ethicists among philosophers = \(\mathrm{34/(34+47) = 34/81}\)
Percentage: \(\mathrm{34/81 = 41.98\%}\)
Majority threshold: 50%
Evidence: 41.98% is less than 50%
Conclusion: NO - Ethicists were NOT the majority of philosophers

Statement 2 Evaluation

Question: Were most survey respondents NOT ethicists?

Calculation: Non-ethicists = \(\mathrm{47 + 23 = 70}\)
Proportion: \(\mathrm{70/104}\)
Percentage: \(\mathrm{70/104 = 67.31\%}\)
Evidence: 67.31% is more than 50%
Conclusion: YES - The majority were NOT ethicists

Statement 3 Evaluation

Question: Were most survey respondents philosophers?

Calculation: Philosophers (ethicists + other) = \(\mathrm{34 + 47 = 81}\)
Proportion: \(\mathrm{81/104}\)
Percentage: \(\mathrm{81/104 = 77.88\%}\)
Evidence: 77.88% is more than 50%
Conclusion: YES - The majority were philosophers

Systematic Checking

Verifying calculations and majority thresholds:

Statement 1: 34 ethicists out of 81 philosophers = 41.98% (NOT majority)
Statement 2: 70 non-ethicists out of 104 total = 67.31% (IS majority)
Statement 3: 81 philosophers out of 104 total = 77.88% (IS majority)
All calculations verified against respondent numbers in analysis

Final Answer

Statement 1: No
Statement 2: Yes
Statement 3: Yes

Answer Choices Explained

Yes

The majority of philosophers who responded to the survey were ethicists.

Yes

The majority of people who responded to the survey were not ethicists.

Yes

The majority of people who responded to the survey were philosophers.

Rate this Solution

Tell us what you think about this solution

...

Forum Discussions

Start a new discussion

Post

Previous Attempts

Loading attempts...