e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Researchers designed an experiment to test whether colonies of ants could choose a high-quality nest site from many options more...

GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions

Source: Official Guide
Two Part Analysis
Verbal - RC
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Researchers designed an experiment to test whether colonies of ants could choose a high-quality nest site from many options more effectively than could individual ants. Colonies and individual ants were both given two levels of tasks: choosing between two nest sites, or choosing from among eight nest sites. In both tasks, half the sites were unsuitable. Researchers discovered that individual ants made much worse decisions when faced with eight options than when faced with two, suggesting that they experienced a cognitive overload. Colonies, on the other hand, chose equally well with either two or eight options, showing that they could better solve the more complex problem as a collective.

According to the experimental results, when the researchers increased the number of site choices, X _ were more likely to choose Y _than when the researchers presented fewer site choices. Select for X and for Y the options that jointly complete the sentence in a manner consistent with the information provided. Make only two selections, one in each column.

X
Y

several nest sites

an unsuitable nest site

a high-quality nest site

individual ants, but not colonies of ants

colonies of ants, but not individual ants

both individual ants and colonies of ants

Solution

Phase 1: Owning the Dataset

First, Create an Argument Analysis Table

Passage Statement Analysis & Implications
"Researchers designed an experiment to test whether colonies of ants could choose a high-quality nest site from many options more effectively than could individual ants"
  • Core Fact: Experiment compares decision-making ability between colonies and individuals
  • Visualization: Testing group intelligence vs individual intelligence
  • Logical Connections: Sets up comparison framework
  • What We Can Conclude: Results will show relative effectiveness
"Colonies and individual ants were both given two levels of tasks: choosing between two nest sites, or choosing from among eight nest sites"
  • Core Fact: Two conditions - 2 choices vs 8 choices
  • Visualization: Simple choice (2 options) vs complex choice (8 options)
  • Logical Connections: Tests effect of complexity on decision-making
  • What We Can Conclude: We can compare performance across complexity levels
"In both tasks, half the sites were unsuitable"
  • Core Fact: 50% unsuitable rate constant
  • Visualization: 2-choice task: 1 good, 1 bad; 8-choice task: 4 good, 4 bad
  • Logical Connections: Controls for difficulty across conditions
  • What We Can Conclude: Random selection would yield 50% error rate
"Individual ants made much worse decisions when faced with eight options than when faced with two"
  • Core Fact: Individual performance declined with more options
  • Visualization: Higher error rate in 8-choice than 2-choice condition
  • Logical Connections: More choices = worse individual performance
  • What We Can Conclude: Individuals chose unsuitable sites more often with 8 options
"Colonies, on the other hand, chose equally well with either two or eight options"
  • Core Fact: Colony performance stayed constant
  • Visualization: Same success rate regardless of number of options
  • Logical Connections: Contrasts with individual performance
  • What We Can Conclude: Colonies were NOT more likely to choose unsuitable sites with more options

Second, Identify Key Patterns

Established Facts:

  • Individual ants performed worse with 8 choices than with 2 choices
  • Colonies performed equally well with 8 choices as with 2 choices
  • "Worse decisions" means choosing unsuitable sites instead of high-quality sites
  • The difference only affected individuals, not colonies

Key Relationship: When choices increased from 2 to 8, individual ants (but not colonies) became more likely to select unsuitable nest sites.

Phase 2: Question Analysis & Prethinking

First, Understand What Each Part Asks

The question asks us to complete: "When the researchers increased the number of site choices, X were more likely to choose Y than when the researchers presented fewer site choices."

  • Part 1 (X): Who/what was affected by the increase in choices?
  • Part 2 (Y): What were they more likely to choose?
  • Relationship: X must be something that performed differently with more choices, and Y must be what they chose more often

Second, Generate Valid Inferences (Prethinking)

For Part 1 (X):

  • Must be individual ants (they performed worse with more choices)
  • Cannot be colonies (they performed equally well)
  • Should specify "individual ants, but not colonies" to be precise

For Part 2 (Y):

  • Must be "unsuitable nest site" (this is what "worse decisions" means)
  • Cannot be "high-quality nest site" (they chose these less often, not more)

Phase 3: Answer Choice Evaluation

Evaluating Options for X:

  1. "several nest sites" - Not an entity that makes choices
  2. "an unsuitable nest site" - This is what was chosen, not who chose
  3. "a high-quality nest site" - This is what was chosen, not who chose
  4. "individual ants, but not colonies of ants" - ✓ Matches our inference perfectly
  5. "colonies of ants, but not individual ants" - Backwards; colonies weren't affected
  6. "both individual ants and colonies of ants" - False; only individuals were affected

Evaluating Options for Y:

  1. "several nest sites" - They chose one site, not several
  2. "an unsuitable nest site" - ✓ This is what individuals chose more often with 8 options
  3. "a high-quality nest site" - They chose these less often, not more
  4. "individual ants, but not colonies of ants" - This describes who, not what was chosen
  5. "colonies of ants, but not individual ants" - This describes who, not what was chosen
  6. "both individual ants and colonies of ants" - This describes who, not what was chosen

Answer Selection Process

Part 1 Selection (X): "individual ants, but not colonies of ants" - This precisely captures who was affected by the increase in choices.

Part 2 Selection (Y): "an unsuitable nest site" - This is what individual ants were more likely to choose when faced with more options.

Verification: The complete sentence reads: "When the researchers increased the number of site choices, individual ants, but not colonies of ants were more likely to choose an unsuitable nest site than when the researchers presented fewer site choices."

This perfectly matches the passage's findings that individual ants made "much worse decisions" (chose unsuitable sites more often) with 8 options, while colonies "chose equally well" with either number of options.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.
Researchers designed an experiment to test whether colonies of ants : Two Part Analysis (TPA)