e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Legal scholar: A lawyer must not acquire literary or media rights to a story based substantially on information relating to...

GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions

Source: Mock
Two Part Analysis
Verbal - RC
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Legal scholar: A lawyer must not acquire literary or media rights to a story based substantially on information relating to the lawyer's representation of a client. However, a lawyer may acquire such rights after the client's legal matter is concluded. The rationale behind this rule is that the client's interest in effective representation may conflict with the lawyer's interest in maximizing the value of the literary or media rights. For instance, the lawyer might conduct the client's criminal trial in a sensational, dramatic manner simply to pump up public interest in the client's story.

Therefore, the rights of a lawyer to obtain literary or media rights are 1_ in order to ensure that the client's legal representation is 2_. Select for 1 and for 2 the options that most logically complete the legal scholar's argument, according to the information provided.

1
2

rational

effective

eliminated

restricted

sensational

Solution

Phase 1: Owning the Dataset

Argument Analysis Table

Passage Statement Analysis & Implications
"A lawyer must not acquire literary or media rights to a story based substantially on information relating to the lawyer's representation of a client"
  • Core Fact: Prohibition during active representation
  • Visualization: If representing Client X in a murder trial, lawyer cannot sign book deal about the case while trial ongoing
  • Logical Connections: This is a restriction, not elimination
  • What We Can Conclude: Rights are limited by timing
"However, a lawyer may acquire such rights after the client's legal matter is concluded"
  • Core Fact: Permission granted post-representation
  • Visualization: After Client X's trial ends, lawyer can then pursue book/movie deals
  • Logical Connections: Confirms this is a temporal restriction
  • What We Can Conclude: Rights exist but are time-restricted
"The rationale behind this rule is that the client's interest in effective representation may conflict with the lawyer's interest in maximizing the value of the literary or media rights"
  • Core Fact: Purpose is preventing conflict of interest
  • Visualization: Lawyer's desire for bestseller could compromise legal strategy
  • Logical Connections: Links restriction to representation quality
  • What We Can Conclude: Rule aims to ensure effective representation
"For instance, the lawyer might conduct the client's criminal trial in a sensational, dramatic manner simply to pump up public interest"
  • Core Fact: Example of how conflict manifests
  • Visualization: Lawyer chooses flashy tactics over sound legal strategy
  • Logical Connections: Shows "sensational" as opposite of "effective"
  • What We Can Conclude: Unrestricted rights could lead to ineffective representation

Key Patterns Identified

  • Temporal restriction: Rights prohibited during representation, allowed after
  • Purpose: Preventing conflict between financial interests and client interests
  • Quality concern: Ensuring representation remains effective, not sensational
  • Not elimination: Rights still exist, just restricted in timing

Phase 2: Question Analysis & Prethinking

Understanding Each Part

  • Part 1 Focus: What happens to the lawyer's rights to obtain literary/media rights?
  • Part 2 Focus: What quality of legal representation is being ensured?
  • Relationship: Part 1 (the restriction) serves the purpose of Part 2 (the desired outcome)

Valid Inferences

  1. For Part 1: The rights are restricted (not eliminated) - they exist but with timing limitations
  2. For Part 2: The representation is kept effective (not sensational) - this is the explicit goal

Phase 3: Answer Choice Evaluation

Examining Each Option:

"rational"

  • What it claims: Something is logical/reasonable
  • Fact Support: No direct support for this characterization
  • Part Suitability: Doesn't fit either part well

"effective"

  • What it claims: Something achieves its intended purpose well
  • Fact Support: Passage explicitly mentions "effective representation" as the goal
  • Part Suitability: Perfect for Part 2 - this is what the rule ensures

"eliminated"

  • What it claims: Something is completely removed
  • Fact Support: Contradicted by "may acquire such rights after"
  • Part Suitability: Too strong for Part 1 - rights aren't eliminated, just restricted

"restricted"

  • What it claims: Something is limited but not eliminated
  • Fact Support: Perfect match - can't acquire during, can acquire after
  • Part Suitability: Ideal for Part 1 - accurately describes the limitation

"sensational"

  • What it claims: Something is dramatic/attention-grabbing
  • Fact Support: Mentioned as the negative outcome to avoid
  • Part Suitability: Opposite of what we want for Part 2

Answer Selection

  • Part 1: "restricted" - The rights are limited by timing, not eliminated
  • Part 2: "effective" - This is the explicit goal of the restriction

Verification

The complete statement reads: "Therefore, the rights of a lawyer to obtain literary or media rights are restricted in order to ensure that the client's legal representation is effective."

This perfectly captures:

  • The temporal limitation (not during, but after representation)
  • The purpose (preventing sensational representation in favor of effective representation)
  • The logical flow from the passage facts
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.