Karin: Every time I go to the park, I notice that there are lizards. Usually when I see one, it...
GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions
Karin: Every time I go to the park, I notice that there are lizards. Usually when I see one, it is a Lacerta viridis, so there are probably a large number of lizards of that species in the park.
Lina: There might be a lot of lizards of that species in the park, but your experiences don't give much evidence that there are.
Select for Supports Karin's inference the statement that, if true, most strongly supports the inference that Karin draws, and select for Supports Lina's position the statement that, if true, most strongly supports the position that Lina expresses. Make only two selections, one in each column.
Phase 1: Owning the Dataset
First, Create an Argument Analysis Table
Text from Passage | Analysis |
---|---|
"Every time I go to the park, I notice that there are lizards" |
|
"Usually when I see one, it is a Lacerta viridis" |
|
"so there are probably a large number of lizards of that species in the park" |
|
"There might be a lot of lizards of that species in the park, but your experiences don't give much evidence that there are" |
|
Second, Identify Argument Structure
After analyzing the passage, we can see:
- Karin's conclusion: There are probably many Lacerta viridis lizards in the park
- Karin's evidence: She usually sees this species when she spots a lizard
- Karin's assumption: Frequent sightings of a species indicate a large population
- Lina's position: The evidence doesn't strongly support the conclusion
- Overall flow: Observation pattern → Population inference → Critique of inference
Phase 2: Question Analysis & Prethinking
First, Understand What Each Part Asks
Let's break down what we need to find:
- Part 1: A statement that strengthens Karin's inference about the large Lacerta viridis population
- Part 2: A statement that supports Lina's position that Karin's experiences don't provide strong evidence
These parts are asking us to find statements that take opposite sides of the argument's validity.
Second, Generate Prethinking Based on Question Type
Since we're looking for strengtheners for both positions:
- For Karin's inference:
- What would make her conclusion about population size more likely?
- For Lina's position:
- What would show that Karin's experiences aren't good evidence?
Third, Develop Specific Prethinking for Each Part
For Part 1 (Supporting Karin):
- If Karin saw many different individual lizards across various locations
- If her sightings represented a good sample of the park's lizard population
For Part 2 (Supporting Lina):
- If Karin's sightings were biased or limited in some way
- If she was repeatedly seeing the same few individuals
- If she lacked knowledge about the total species diversity
Phase 3: Answer Choice Evaluation
Evaluating Each Choice
Choice A: "At least some of the lizards that Lina has seen in the park are of a species other than Lacerta viridis."
- This is about Lina's observations, not directly relevant to evaluating Karin's reasoning
- Doesn't strongly support either position
Choice B: "Lina knows that at least three different species of lizards inhabit the park."
- This suggests species diversity, but doesn't directly challenge Karin's evidence
- Weak support for Lina's position at best
Choice C: "Karin does not know how many different species of lizards inhabit the park."
- This shows a limitation in Karin's knowledge
- Moderately supports Lina's position by highlighting incomplete information
Choice D: "Most of Karin's lizard sightings in the park have been observations of the same individual Lacerta viridis."
- This is devastating to Karin's inference!
- If she's seeing the same individual repeatedly, that doesn't indicate a large population
- Strongly supports Lina's position
Choice E: "Karin has seen many lizards in many different parts of the park."
- This suggests widespread distribution and multiple sightings
- If combined with her observation that most are Lacerta viridis, this would indicate a large population
- Strongly supports Karin's inference
The Correct Answers
For Part 1 (Supports Karin's inference): Choice E
- If Karin has seen many lizards across different park areas, and most are Lacerta viridis, this genuinely suggests a large population of that species
For Part 2 (Supports Lina's position): Choice D
- If most sightings are of the same individual, then frequent observations don't indicate population size at all - perfectly supporting Lina's critique
Common Traps to Highlight
Choice C might seem attractive for supporting Lina's position because it shows Karin lacks complete information. However, it's weaker than Choice D because:
- Not knowing total species count doesn't necessarily invalidate population estimates for one species
- Choice D provides a specific, concrete reason why the experiences don't support the inference
Choice B might initially seem to support Lina by suggesting diversity, but:
- Knowing about other species doesn't directly challenge the evidence about Lacerta viridis frequency
- It's what Lina knows, not what affects Karin's reasoning