Loading...
Is \(|\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{c}| + |\mathrm{a}| = |\mathrm{c}|\)?
We need to determine whether \(|\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{c}| + |\mathrm{a}| = |\mathrm{c}|\). This is a yes/no question about absolute values.
Let's visualize this on a number line:
The equation asks: Does traveling from a to c, then from a to 0, equal the direct distance from c to 0?
This equation holds true when and only when 0 lies between a and c on the number line.
Here's why: When you go from a to c and pass through 0, the sum of distances equals the total distance. But if 0 is outside the interval between a and c, you're taking an indirect path that's longer than the direct distance \(|\mathrm{c}|\).
For sufficiency: We need to definitively know whether 0 lies between a and c.
Statement 1: \(\mathrm{ab} > \mathrm{bc}\)
This can be rewritten as \(\mathrm{b}(\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{c}) > 0\), meaning b and (a-c) have the same sign.
If \(\mathrm{b} > 0\): then \(\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{c} > 0\), so \(\mathrm{a} > \mathrm{c}\)
If \(\mathrm{b} < 0\): then \(\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{c} < 0\), so \(\mathrm{a} < \mathrm{c}\)
This tells us the relative positions of a and c, but nothing about where 0 sits.
Scenario 1: Let \(\mathrm{a} = 2\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
Scenario 2: Let \(\mathrm{a} = 0\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = -1\)
Different scenarios give different answers.
Statement 1 is NOT sufficient. [STOP - Not Sufficient!]
This eliminates choices A and D.
Now we forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2: \(\mathrm{ab} < 0\)
This means a and b have opposite signs. But this tells us nothing about c or where c sits relative to 0 and a.
Scenario 1: Let \(\mathrm{a} = 2\), \(\mathrm{b} = -1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 1\)
Scenario 2: Let \(\mathrm{a} = 1\), \(\mathrm{b} = -1\), \(\mathrm{c} = -3\)
Wait, this seems wrong. Let me reconsider...
Actually, for the equation to be TRUE when 0 is between a and c, we need a specific arrangement. Let me try:
Revised Scenario 2: Let \(\mathrm{a} = -2\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 3\)
The issue is that for \(|\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{c}| + |\mathrm{a}| = |\mathrm{c}|\) to be true, we need the specific case where a and c are on opposite sides of 0, AND going from a to c passes through 0 in a way that makes the sum equal to \(|\mathrm{c}|\).
Better Scenario 2: Let \(\mathrm{a} = -1\), \(\mathrm{b} = 1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 2\)
Correct Scenario 2: Let \(\mathrm{a} = 1\), \(\mathrm{b} = -1\), \(\mathrm{c} = 2\)
Different scenarios give different answers.
Statement 2 is NOT sufficient. [STOP - Not Sufficient!]
This eliminates choice B (and D was already eliminated).
Now we use both statements together:
Case 1: If \(\mathrm{a} > 0\) and \(\mathrm{b} < 0\)
Case 2: If \(\mathrm{a} < 0\) and \(\mathrm{b} > 0\)
In both cases, 0 lies between a and c!
When 0 lies between a and c in this way:
The equation is TRUE in both cases, so we can definitively answer YES.
Both statements together are SUFFICIENT. [STOP - Sufficient!]
This eliminates choice E.
Both statements together guarantee that 0 must lie between a and c, which makes the equation \(|\mathrm{a}-\mathrm{c}| + |\mathrm{a}| = |\mathrm{c}|\) true.
Answer Choice C: "Both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient."