e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

In recent years, commercial beekeepers have reported colony collapse: the disappearance of entire colonies of bees. A biologist, Dr. B,...

GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions

Source: Official Guide
Two Part Analysis
Verbal - RC
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

In recent years, commercial beekeepers have reported colony collapse: the disappearance of entire colonies of bees. A biologist, Dr. B, argues that colony collapse is caused by a new parasite, to which bees have not acquired immunity. A chemist, Dr. C, argues that colony collapse is caused by genetic damage from pesticides. And an ecologist, Dr. E, argues that 3 specific commercial beekeeping practices—transportation of hives over long distances, indiscriminate medication, and inbreeding—compromise both the immunity and the genetic diversity of bees, leaving them susceptible to mass die-offs from normally benign microbes.

Complete the table based on the stated views of Dr. B, Dr. C, and Dr. E. In the first column, select the factor common to both Dr. B's and Dr. E's accounts of colony collapse. In the second column, select the factor common to both Dr. C's and Dr. E's accounts of colony collapse. Make two selections, one in each column.

Dr. B and Dr. E
Dr. C and Dr. E

Factor

Genetics

Immunity

Medication

New parasites

Normally benign microbes

Pesticides

Solution

TPA Inference Solution: Colony Collapse Analysis

Phase 1: Owning the Dataset

Argument Analysis Table

Passage Statement Analysis & Implications
"Dr. B argues that colony collapse is caused by a new parasite, to which bees have not acquired immunity"
  • Core Fact: Dr. B attributes colony collapse to new parasites
  • Visualization: Bees encounter unfamiliar parasites → no existing immunity → colony dies
  • Logical Connection: Links immunity deficiency to vulnerability
  • What We Can Conclude: Dr. B sees immunity as crucial factor
"Dr. C argues that colony collapse is caused by genetic damage from pesticides"
  • Core Fact: Dr. C attributes colony collapse to pesticide-induced genetic damage
  • Visualization: Pesticides → genetic damage → colony collapse
  • Logical Connection: Direct causation from chemicals to genetic harm
  • What We Can Conclude: Dr. C focuses on genetic integrity
"Dr. E argues that 3 specific commercial beekeeping practices...compromise both the immunity and the genetic diversity of bees"
  • Core Fact: Dr. E attributes collapse to practices harming both immunity AND genetics
  • Visualization: Commercial practices → weakened immunity + reduced genetic diversity → vulnerability to microbes
  • Logical Connection: Multiple factors create vulnerability
  • What We Can Conclude: Dr. E incorporates both immunity and genetic factors
"leaving them susceptible to mass die-offs from normally benign microbes"
  • Core Fact: Dr. E specifies that weakened bees die from usually harmless microbes
  • Visualization: Healthy bees survive these microbes; compromised bees cannot
  • Logical Connection: The problem isn't new threats but reduced resistance
  • What We Can Conclude: Dr. E's theory differs from Dr. B's "new parasite" focus

Key Patterns Identified

  • Dr. B's theory: Immunity-focused (lack of immunity to new threats)
  • Dr. C's theory: Genetics-focused (pesticide damage)
  • Dr. E's theory: Both immunity AND genetics-focused (commercial practices harm both)

Phase 2: Question Analysis & Prethinking

Understanding Each Part

  • Part 1 Focus: What factor appears in both Dr. B's and Dr. E's explanations?
  • Part 2 Focus: What factor appears in both Dr. C's and Dr. E's explanations?
  • Relationship: We're finding the overlapping elements between different scientists' theories

Valid Inferences

  1. For Dr. B & Dr. E: Both discuss immunity as a crucial factor
    • Dr. B: Bees lack immunity to new parasites
    • Dr. E: Commercial practices compromise bee immunity
  2. For Dr. C & Dr. E: Both discuss genetic factors
    • Dr. C: Pesticides cause genetic damage
    • Dr. E: Commercial practices reduce genetic diversity

Phase 3: Answer Choice Evaluation

Analyzing Each Option:

"Factor": Too vague; not a specific commonality

"Genetics":
- Dr. C mentions genetic damage
- Dr. E mentions genetic diversity compromise
- Valid for Dr. C & Dr. E comparison

"Immunity":
- Dr. B mentions lack of immunity
- Dr. E mentions compromised immunity
- Valid for Dr. B & Dr. E comparison

"Medication":
- Only Dr. E mentions this (as one of three practices)
- Not mentioned by Dr. B or Dr. C

"New parasites":
- Only Dr. B mentions this
- Dr. E specifically mentions "normally benign microbes" (opposite of new)

"Normally benign microbes":
- Only Dr. E mentions this
- Contradicts Dr. B's "new parasite" theory

"Pesticides":
- Only Dr. C mentions this
- Not part of Dr. B's or Dr. E's primary explanation

Answer Selection

Column 1 (Dr. B and Dr. E): Immunity
- Both scientists identify immunity issues as central to colony collapse
- Dr. B: Lack of acquired immunity
- Dr. E: Compromised immunity from commercial practices

Column 2 (Dr. C and Dr. E): Genetics
- Both scientists identify genetic factors as central to colony collapse
- Dr. C: Genetic damage from pesticides
- Dr. E: Reduced genetic diversity from commercial practices

Verification

We can confirm:
- Each answer is independently supported by the passage
- The pair completely addresses both parts of the question
- No speculation beyond stated facts
- Each column has exactly one correct answer

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.
In recent years, commercial beekeepers have reported colony collapse: the : Two Part Analysis (TPA)