Loading...
In an economic context, crowding out refers to the replacement of private sources of money with public funding. A researcher measured the extent to which the introduction of the Farmer's Pension Program (FPP) in Taiwan in 1995 induced crowding out of private funds given to pension-aged farmers, mainly by their adult children. The study compared data from 1990 to 2001 for two groups. farmers ages 66 and older who received FPP benefits beginning in 1995, and nonfarmers of the same age group who did not receive FPP benefits. A table and graph from the study are provided.
The key question is this: When a pensioner receives a dollar of benefit from the government program, to what extent does his or her income rise? Results from the study indicate significant but incomplete crowding out in that one FPP dollar replaced 30 to 39 cents of private funds. The results also suggest a significant, positive effect of the FPP on recipients' household consumption spending.
For each of the following statements about the effects of the FPP, select Yes if the statement accurately reflects the information provided. Otherwise select No.
Average private funds received by nonfarmers did not change during the first three years of the program (1995-1997).
The greatest change in average private funds received by farmers in a single year occurred during the first three years of the program (1995-1997).
Per capita income among farmers ages 66 and up, not including FPP payments or private funds received, was little affected by the introduction of the FPP.
| Information from Dataset | Analysis |
|---|---|
| ""crowding out refers to the replacement of private sources of money with public funding"" |
|
| ""A researcher measured the extent to which the introduction of the Farmer's Pension Program (FPP) in Taiwan in 1995 induced crowding out of private funds given to pension-aged farmers, mainly by their adult children"" |
|
| ""compared data from 1990 to 2001 for two groups: farmers ages 66 and older who received FPP benefits beginning in 1995, and nonfarmers of the same age group who did not receive FPP benefits"" |
|
| ""one FPP dollar replaced 30 to 39 cents of private funds"" |
|
| ""significant, positive effect of the FPP on recipients' household consumption spending"" |
|
Summary: Taiwan's 1995 Farmer's Pension Program partially replaced family support (30-39% crowding out) but still increased farmers' net income and consumption spending.
Summary: The table reveals farmers' consumption increased 44% despite flat income and private support, while the control group (nonfarmers) showed natural growth in both income and private support.
Summary: The graph dramatically illustrates how FPP benefits starting in 1995 coincided with farmers' private support stabilizing at lower levels while nonfarmers' support continued its natural upward trajectory.
The Taiwan Farmer's Pension Program study reveals a nuanced success story: while government pensions did partially replace family financial support (30-39% crowding out), elderly farmers still came out significantly ahead. The data shows farmers' consumption increased by 44% despite receiving slightly less family support, because each pension dollar provided a net gain of 61-70 cents. Meanwhile, the nonfarmer control group demonstrated what would have happened naturally - continued growth in both income and family support - validating that the changes for farmers were indeed caused by the pension program.
Average private funds received by nonfarmers did not change during the first three years of the program (1995-1997).
The greatest change in average private funds received by farmers in a single year occurred during the first three years of the program (1995-1997).
Per capita income among farmers ages 66 and up, not including FPP payments or private funds received, was little affected by the introduction of the FPP.