e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

If there are B boys and G girls in a club, can the girls be divided equally among 6 teams...

GMAT Data Sufficiency : (DS) Questions

Source: Mock
Data Sufficiency
DS - Number Properties
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

If there are \(\mathrm{B}\) boys and \(\mathrm{G}\) girls in a club, can the girls be divided equally among \(6\) teams with no girls left over?

  1. If there were \(4\) fewer girls, then the number of girls would be twice the number of boys.
  2. If the number of boys were \(2\) less than twice the actual number of boys, then the boys could be divided equally among \(6\) teams with no boys left over.
A
Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient but statement (2) ALONE is not sufficient.
B
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient but statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient.
C
BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are not sufficient.
Solution

Understanding the Question

The question asks: Can the girls be divided equally among 6 teams with no girls left over?

In other words, we need to determine whether \(\mathrm{G}\) (the number of girls) is divisible by 6. Since \(\mathrm{6 = 2 \times 3}\), this means \(\mathrm{G}\) must be divisible by both 2 and 3.

For this yes/no question to be sufficient, we need to definitively answer either "Yes, \(\mathrm{G}\) is divisible by 6" or "No, \(\mathrm{G}\) is not divisible by 6" for all possible cases.

Given information:

  • \(\mathrm{B}\) = number of boys in the club
  • \(\mathrm{G}\) = number of girls in the club
  • We need to determine: Is \(\mathrm{G}\) divisible by 6?

Analyzing Statement 1

Statement 1 tells us: "If there were 4 fewer girls, then the number of girls would be twice the number of boys."

This translates to: \(\mathrm{G - 4 = 2B}\), which means \(\mathrm{G = 2B + 4}\)

Let's think about what this tells us about divisibility:

  • Since \(\mathrm{G = 2B + 4 = 2(B + 2)}\), we know \(\mathrm{G}\) is always even (divisible by 2) ✓
  • But what about divisibility by 3?

Let's test different scenarios based on \(\mathrm{B}\)'s remainder when divided by 3:

  • If \(\mathrm{B \equiv 0 \pmod{3}}\), like \(\mathrm{B = 3}\): \(\mathrm{G = 2(3) + 4 = 10}\)\(\mathrm{10 \div 3 = 3}\) remainder 1 → not divisible by 3
  • If \(\mathrm{B \equiv 1 \pmod{3}}\), like \(\mathrm{B = 4}\): \(\mathrm{G = 2(4) + 4 = 12}\)\(\mathrm{12 \div 3 = 4}\) remainder 0 → divisible by 3
  • If \(\mathrm{B \equiv 2 \pmod{3}}\), like \(\mathrm{B = 5}\): \(\mathrm{G = 2(5) + 4 = 14}\)\(\mathrm{14 \div 3 = 4}\) remainder 2 → not divisible by 3

Since different values of \(\mathrm{B}\) lead to different answers about whether \(\mathrm{G}\) is divisible by 6, Statement 1 alone cannot tell us definitively whether the girls can be divided equally among 6 teams.

Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.

[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choices A and D.

Analyzing Statement 2

Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.

Statement 2 tells us: "If the number of boys were 2 less than twice the actual number of boys, then the boys could be divided equally among 6 teams with no boys left over."

This means \(\mathrm{2B - 2}\) is divisible by 6.

What can we deduce from this?

  • \(\mathrm{2B - 2 = 2(B - 1)}\) must be divisible by 6
  • For \(\mathrm{2(B - 1)}\) to be divisible by 6, the factor \(\mathrm{(B - 1)}\) must be divisible by 3
  • Therefore, \(\mathrm{B - 1 \equiv 0 \pmod{3}}\), which means \(\mathrm{B \equiv 1 \pmod{3}}\)

But here's the crucial point: This tells us something about \(\mathrm{B}\)'s divisibility properties, but nothing about \(\mathrm{G}\)! Without any relationship between \(\mathrm{B}\) and \(\mathrm{G}\), we cannot determine whether \(\mathrm{G}\) is divisible by 6.

Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.

[STOP - Not Sufficient!] This eliminates choice B (and confirms D is already eliminated).

Combining Both Statements

Now let's use both pieces of information together:

  • From Statement 1: \(\mathrm{G = 2B + 4}\)
  • From Statement 2: \(\mathrm{B \equiv 1 \pmod{3}}\) (\(\mathrm{B}\) leaves remainder 1 when divided by 3)

Let's trace through the divisibility:

  • Since \(\mathrm{B \equiv 1 \pmod{3}}\), we know \(\mathrm{B}\) leaves remainder 1 when divided by 3
  • This means \(\mathrm{2B}\) leaves remainder 2 when divided by 3 (since \(\mathrm{2 \times 1 = 2}\))
  • Therefore, \(\mathrm{2B + 4}\) leaves remainder \(\mathrm{2 + 4 = 6}\) when divided by 3
  • But \(\mathrm{6 \equiv 0 \pmod{3}}\), so \(\mathrm{G}\) is divisible by 3

We already established from Statement 1 that \(\mathrm{G = 2(B + 2)}\) is always even (divisible by 2)

Since \(\mathrm{G}\) is divisible by both 2 and 3, it must be divisible by 6. We can definitively answer "Yes" - the girls can be divided equally among 6 teams.

The combined statements are SUFFICIENT.

[STOP - Sufficient!] This eliminates choice E.

The Answer: C

Both statements together are sufficient to determine that the girls can be divided equally among 6 teams, but neither statement alone is sufficient.

Answer Choice C: "Both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient."

Answer Choices Explained
A
Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient but statement (2) ALONE is not sufficient.
B
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient but statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient.
C
BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are not sufficient.
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.