Loading...
If \(\mathrm{n}\text{ and }\mathrm{t}\) are positive integers, what is the greatest prime factor of \(\mathrm{nt}\)?
We need to find the greatest prime factor of the product nt, where n and t are positive integers.
To have sufficiency, we must be able to identify exactly one specific value for the greatest prime factor of nt. This means either:
The greatest prime factor of a product depends on all the prime factors present in both numbers being multiplied. Even if we don't know the exact values of n and t, we might still be able to determine their greatest prime factor if we have the right constraints.
Statement 1: The greatest common factor of n and t is 5.
This means both n and t are divisible by 5 (since 5 is prime). We can write:
But here's what we don't know: what other prime factors might be present in n or t beyond the common factor of 5.
Let's explore specific possibilities to see if we get a consistent answer:
Scenario 1: n = 5, t = 5
Scenario 2: n = 5, t = 35 = 5 × 7
Scenario 3: \(\mathrm{n = 15 = 3 \times 5, t = 25 = 5^2}\)
Notice how different scenarios yield different greatest prime factors (5 in some cases, 7 in others). This shows we cannot determine a unique answer.
[STOP - Not Sufficient!] Statement 1 alone is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates answer choices A and D.
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2: The least common multiple of n and t is 105.
First, let's find the prime factorization of 105:
\(\mathrm{105 = 3 \times 5 \times 7}\)
The LCM contains all prime factors that appear in either n or t, raised to their highest powers. This crucial property tells us:
Since:
We can conclude with certainty that 7 is the greatest prime factor of nt.
It doesn't matter how n and t split up the factors 3, 5, and 7 between them—the product nt will contain all these primes, and 7 will always be the largest.
[STOP - Sufficient!] Statement 2 alone is sufficient.
This eliminates answer choices C and E.
Statement 2 alone tells us the LCM is \(\mathrm{105 = 3 \times 5 \times 7}\), which guarantees that 7 is the greatest prime factor of nt. Statement 1 alone leaves multiple possibilities open.
Answer Choice B: "Statement 2 alone is sufficient, but Statement 1 alone is not sufficient."