Loading...
Each piece of candy in a certain jar is either brown, red, or green. If the jar has a total of \(\mathrm{312}\) pieces of candy, what is the ratio of the number of green pieces of candy to the number of brown pieces of candy in the jar?
The question asks us to find the ratio of green pieces to brown pieces of candy. Let's think about what we need to determine sufficiency.
For sufficiency, we need to determine a unique ratio of green:brown. This is crucial - we don't need the actual numbers of green and brown candies, just their relationship to each other.
Since we're looking for a ratio rather than specific values, a statement that tells us the relationship between green and brown pieces might be sufficient on its own, even without knowing exact quantities.
Statement 1 tells us: "There are 200 percent more green pieces of candy than brown pieces of candy."
Let's translate this percentage relationship step by step:
This directly gives us the ratio! No matter how many brown pieces there are:
[STOP - Statement 1 is SUFFICIENT!]
Statement 1 is sufficient to determine the ratio of green to brown pieces.
This eliminates choices B, C, and E. We're left with A or D.
Important: Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2 tells us: "There are 216 red pieces of candy in the jar."
With 216 red pieces out of 312 total pieces:
This tells us the sum of brown and green pieces, but not how they're split between the two colors.
Let's check if different splits give us the same ratio:
| Brown Pieces | Green Pieces | Total | Green:Brown Ratio |
| 24 | 72 | 96 ✓ | \(72:24 = 3:1\) |
| 32 | 64 | 96 ✓ | \(64:32 = 2:1\) |
| 16 | 80 | 96 ✓ | \(80:16 = 5:1\) |
Different valid splits produce different ratios. We cannot determine a unique ratio from Statement 2 alone.
Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choice D.
Since Statement 1 alone is sufficient but Statement 2 alone is not sufficient, the answer is A.
Answer Choice A: "Statement 1 alone is sufficient, but Statement 2 alone is not sufficient."