Each of the five divisions of a certain company sent representatives to a conference. If the numbers of representatives sent...
GMAT Data Sufficiency : (DS) Questions
Each of the five divisions of a certain company sent representatives to a conference. If the numbers of representatives sent by four of the divisions were 3, 4, 5, and 5, was the range of the numbers of representatives sent by the five divisions greater than 2 ?
- The median of the numbers of representatives sent by the five divisions was greater than the average (arithmetic mean) of these numbers.
- The median of the numbers of representatives sent by the five divisions was 4.
Understanding the Question
We need to determine whether the range of representatives sent by five divisions is greater than 2.
Given Information
- Five divisions sent representatives to a conference
- Four divisions sent: 3, 4, 5, and 5 representatives
- One division sent an unknown number of representatives (let's call it x)
What We Need to Find
The range = (maximum value - minimum value)
Here's the key insight: The range depends entirely on where x falls:
- If x is between 3 and 5 (inclusive): \(\mathrm{range} = 5 - 3 = 2\)
- If \(x < 3\): then x becomes the minimum, so \(\mathrm{range} = 5 - x > 2\)
- If \(x > 5\): then x becomes the maximum, so \(\mathrm{range} = x - 3 > 2\)
So we're really asking: Is x outside the interval \([3, 5]\)?
For this question to be answerable with certainty, we need information that forces x to be either less than 3 or greater than 5.
Analyzing Statement 1
Statement 1: The median of the five numbers was greater than the average.
This gives us a relationship between two key statistics. Let's think through what this means:
- The median is the middle value when sorted
- The average includes all values equally
- When median > average, it typically indicates the data is left-skewed (some low values pulling the average down)
Let's test whether this forces x outside \([3, 5]\):
Test Case 1: Let \(x = 4\) (right in the middle of our known values)
- Sorted values: 3, 4, 4, 5, 5
- Median = 4
- Average = \(21/5 = 4.2\)
- But here median < average! ❌
This tells us x can't be in the middle range. Good start! Let's check the extremes:
Test Case 2: Let \(x = 2\) (less than 3)
- Sorted values: 2, 3, 4, 5, 5
- Median = 4
- Average = \(19/5 = 3.8\)
- Median > average ✓ and \(\mathrm{range} = 5 - 2 = 3 > 2\) ✓
Test Case 3: Let \(x = 5\) (at the upper boundary)
- Sorted values: 3, 4, 5, 5, 5
- Median = 5
- Average = \(22/5 = 4.4\)
- Median > average ✓ but \(\mathrm{range} = 5 - 3 = 2\) ❌
Different values of x that satisfy the condition lead to different answers about whether range > 2.
Statement 1 is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choices A and D.
Analyzing Statement 2
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2: The median equals 4.
For the median to be 4, when we sort all five numbers, the middle one must be 4. Since we already have a 4 among our known values, this happens when x doesn't push the 4 out of the middle position.
This occurs when \(x \leq 4\).
Let's test whether this constraint determines if range > 2:
Test Case 1: Let \(x = 2\) (less than 3)
- Sorted: 2, 3, 4, 5, 5
- Median = 4 ✓
- Range = \(5 - 2 = 3 > 2\) ✓
Test Case 2: Let \(x = 3.5\) (between 3 and 4)
- Sorted: 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 5
- Median = 4 ✓
- Range = \(5 - 3 = 2\) ❌
Again, different values of x that make the median 4 lead to different conclusions about whether range > 2.
Statement 2 is NOT sufficient.
This eliminates choice B.
Combining Statements
Now let's see what happens when we use both statements together.
From Statement 1: Median > Average
From Statement 2: Median = 4
This means: \(4 > \mathrm{Average}\)
Since the sum of our known values is \(3 + 4 + 5 + 5 = 17\), the average = \((17 + x)/5\).
So we need:
\(4 > (17 + x)/5\)
Solving this inequality:
- \(20 > 17 + x\)
- \(x < 3\)
Here's the crucial insight:
- Statement 2 tells us \(x \leq 4\) (for median to be 4)
- Statement 1 further restricts this to \(x < 3\) (for median to exceed average)
When \(x < 3\), it becomes the minimum value in our set, making the \(\mathrm{range} = 5 - x\).
Since \(x < 3\), we have:
\(\mathrm{range} = 5 - x > 5 - 3 = 2\) ✓
[STOP - Sufficient!]
Therefore, when both statements are true, the range must be greater than 2.
The statements together are sufficient.
This eliminates choice E.
The Answer: C
Both statements together tell us that \(x < 3\), which guarantees the range is greater than 2. Neither statement alone provides this certainty.
Answer Choice C: "Both statements together are sufficient, but neither statement alone is sufficient."