Loading...

At the end of last semester, all 33 students (11 from each of 3 sections) of a particular course were asked how many hours per week they spent studying for the course. This data was combined with the number of points earned by each student in the course. This information is presented in the graph.
Grades in the course were calculated using a 20-point scale. To compute the grade, the number of points earned in the course was divided by 50 and then rounded up to the next whole number.
Use the drop-down menus to complete each statement so that it is consistent with the information provided.
| Text Component | Literal Content | Simple Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Study Population | "all 33 students (11 from each of 3 sections) of a particular course" | There are 33 students total, split equally into three sections (A, B, C), each with 11 students. |
| Data Collected | "asked how many hours per week they spent studying for the course" | Each student self-reported the number of hours per week they studied for this course. |
| Combined With | "data was combined with the number of points earned by each student in the course" | The dataset includes, for every student, both their self-reported study hours and their actual points earned in the course. |
| Presentation | "This information is presented in the graph" | The summary of the students' study hours and earned points is depicted visually in a graph. |
| Grading Scale | "Grades in the course were calculated using a 20-point scale" | The course uses a 20-point grading rubric. |
| Grade Calculation | "number of points earned ... divided by 50 and then rounded up to ... whole number" | Grade = \(\mathrm{(points\ earned) ÷ 50}\), rounded up to the nearest whole number, so 751 points is grade 16. |
| Chart Component | What's Shown | What This Tells Us |
|---|---|---|
| Graph Type | Scatter plot with 3 section marker types (A: open circles, B: filled squares, C: filled circles) | Each point on the plot represents a student; section membership is visually coded. |
| X-axis | Hours studied per week \(\mathrm{(0–9)}\) | Students reported anywhere from 0 up to around 9 hours of study weekly. |
| Y-axis | Points earned in course \(\mathrm{(500–1000)}\) | Students' performance varied from about 500 up to just under 1000 points (potentially out of 1000). |
| Number of Data Points | Section A (9), Section B (10), Section C (11) | Displayed points do not perfectly match the stated 11 students per section; some section data may be missing or miscounted. |
| Data Distribution | Clusters mostly between \(\mathrm{1–6\ hours}\) (x-axis), points spread across the y-axis | Most students studied 1–6 hours per week, but their scores covered most of the grade range. |
| Pattern/Trend | No clear linear pattern; scores vary widely for similar study hours | There is no strong visible correlation between study hours per week and points earned; high and low performers in all study bands. |
The median reported time spent studying for all students in the course was ______ hours per week.
Statement Breakdown 1:
Statement Breakdown 2:
What is needed: What is the 17th smallest study hour value (the median) among all students?
Section ______ had the smallest average (arithmetic mean) reported time spent studying per week.
Statement Breakdown 1:
Statement Breakdown 2:
What is needed: Which section (A, B, or C) has the lowest average study hours?
To answer, we determined the median among all 33 study hour reports by finding the 17th value in order (which is 3), and calculated averages by section to discover Section C had the lowest (about 2.5 hours per week).
Blank 1 requires considering all students jointly for the median, while Blank 2 is about comparing averages by section. Each can be solved independently of the other.