e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

An archaeologist studying Artifacts A–D is interested in whether Artifact C is older than Artifact A.

GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions

Source: Official Guide
Two Part Analysis
Verbal - RC
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

An archaeologist studying Artifacts A–D is interested in whether Artifact C is older than Artifact A.

Select an assertion involving Artifact A and an assertion involving Artifact C that together imply the assertion "Artifact C is older than Artifact A." Make only two selections, one in each column.

Assertion involving Artifact A

Assertion involving Artifact C

Artifact A is older than Artifact B.

Artifact A is older than Artifact B.

Artifact A is older than Artifact D.

Artifact A is older than Artifact D.

Artifact B is older than Artifact A.

Artifact B is older than Artifact A.

Artifact B is older than Artifact D.

Artifact B is older than Artifact D.

Artifact C is older than Artifact D

Artifact C is older than Artifact D

Artifact C is older than Artifact B.

Artifact C is older than Artifact B.

Solution

Phase 1: Owning the Dataset

Argument Analysis Table

Passage Statement Analysis & Implications
"An archaeologist studying Artifacts A–D"
  • Core Fact: We have exactly 4 artifacts labeled A, B, C, and D
  • Visualization: Think of these as 4 archaeological finds that can be arranged by age
  • Logical Connections: Any age relationships between these artifacts can be compared
  • What We Can Conclude: We're working within a closed set of 4 items
"is interested in whether Artifact C is older than Artifact A"
  • Core Fact: The target conclusion is determining if \(\mathrm{C > A}\) (where > means "is older than")
  • Visualization: We need to establish a chronological ordering that places C before A
  • Logical Connections: This might require indirect proof through other artifacts
  • What We Can Conclude: We need assertions that logically lead to \(\mathrm{C > A}\)

Key Patterns Identified

  • We have a finite set of 4 artifacts (A, B, C, D)
  • We need to establish relative age relationships
  • The goal is to prove C is older than A
  • We can use transitive properties (if X > Y and Y > Z, then X > Z)

Phase 2: Question Analysis & Prethinking

Understanding Each Part

  • Part 1 Focus: We need an assertion about Artifact A's age relative to another artifact
  • Part 2 Focus: We need an assertion about Artifact C's age relative to another artifact
  • Relationship: These two assertions must combine to prove \(\mathrm{C > A}\)

Valid Inference Generation

To prove \(\mathrm{C > A}\), we can:

  1. Direct comparison: Not available in our answer choices
  2. Indirect proof through B: If \(\mathrm{C > B}\) and \(\mathrm{B > A}\), then \(\mathrm{C > A}\)
  3. Indirect proof through D: If \(\mathrm{C > D}\) and \(\mathrm{D > A}\), then \(\mathrm{C > A}\)

Phase 3: Answer Choice Evaluation

Column 1 Options (Assertions involving Artifact A):

Option 1: "Artifact A is older than Artifact B" (\(\mathrm{A > B}\))

  • What it claims: A predates B chronologically
  • For our goal: If \(\mathrm{A > B}\), and we know something about C and B, this might not help prove \(\mathrm{C > A}\)

Option 2: "Artifact A is older than Artifact D" (\(\mathrm{A > D}\))

  • What it claims: A predates D chronologically
  • For our goal: Combined with \(\mathrm{C > D}\) wouldn't prove \(\mathrm{C > A}\)

Option 3: "Artifact B is older than Artifact A" (\(\mathrm{B > A}\))

  • What it claims: B predates A chronologically
  • For our goal: If \(\mathrm{B > A}\), and we can show \(\mathrm{C > B}\), then \(\mathrm{C > A}\)

Column 2 Options (Assertions involving Artifact C):

Option 5: "Artifact C is older than Artifact D" (\(\mathrm{C > D}\))

  • What it claims: C predates D chronologically
  • For our goal: Would need \(\mathrm{D > A}\) from Column 1, which isn't available

Option 6: "Artifact C is older than Artifact B" (\(\mathrm{C > B}\))

  • What it claims: C predates B chronologically
  • For our goal: Combined with \(\mathrm{B > A}\) would prove \(\mathrm{C > A}\)

Answer Selection Process

  1. Part 1 Selection: "Artifact B is older than Artifact A" - This gives us \(\mathrm{B > A}\)
  2. Part 2 Selection: "Artifact C is older than Artifact B" - This gives us \(\mathrm{C > B}\)
  3. Verification: \(\mathrm{C > B}\) and \(\mathrm{B > A}\)\(\mathrm{C > A}\)

The transitive property confirms our goal: Since C is older than B, and B is older than A, then C must be older than A.

Common Traps Avoided

  • We didn't assume relationships not stated in our selected assertions
  • We relied only on logical transitivity, not speculation
  • Each assertion is meaningful on its own and together they form a complete proof
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.