Loading...
An apple farm installed a fish pond on its land to save money and increase potential revenue. Waste apples and other apple by-products are used to supplement the diet of the fish while the waste from the pond is used to fertilize the apple trees. Fish and apples are both sold for profit. The graph shows the total cost of fertilizer per 10 kg of apples that are sold as well as the total number of fish sold in each year.
Use the drop-down menus to complete the statements in a manner consistent with the given information.
| Text Component | Literal Content | Simple Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| System setup | An apple farm installed a fish pond on its land to save money and increase potential revenue. | Apple farm added fish pond to improve finances and expand business. |
| Resource cycling | Waste apples and other apple by-products are used to supplement the diet of the fish while the waste from the pond is used to fertilize the apple trees. | Apples feed fish; fish waste fertilizes apple trees—closed-loop sustainability. |
| Revenue sources | Fish and apples are both sold for profit. | Both apples and fish contribute to farm income. |
| Data displayed | The graph shows the total cost of fertilizer per 10 kg of apples that are sold as well as the total number of fish sold in each year. | Chart tracks fertilizer cost (per 10kg apples) and fish sold each year. |
| Chart Component | What's Shown | What This Tells Us |
|---|---|---|
| Chart type | Dual-axis line chart over 5 years | Compares fertilizer costs and fish sales over time. |
| X-axis | Years 1 to 5 | Data covers five yearly intervals. |
| Left Y-axis | Number of fish sold (0 to 3500) | Measures fish production output. |
| Right Y-axis | Fertilizer cost per 10 kg apples sold (\(\$0.00 \text{ to } \$0.07\)) | Quantifies fertilizer expense for apple sales. |
| Fish sold trend | Dashed line with circle markers, increasing from \(0 \text{ to } 3500\) | Fish production rises sharply, then growth rate slows after year 3. |
| Fertilizer cost trend | Solid line with squares, decreasing from \(\$0.05 \text{ to } \$0.005\) | Fertilizer costs decline steadily as fish production increases. |
| Series relationship | Fish sold increases; fertilizer costs decrease | Higher fish output (using apple by-products) reduces need for external inputs. |
The dataset shows that integrating aquaculture with apple farming creates a beneficial feedback cycle. As fish production rises from \(0 \text{ to } 3500\) over five years, the cost of fertilizer per 10 kg of apples sold drops dramatically from \(\$0.05 \text{ to } \$0.005\). The average annual decrease in fertilizer cost is about \(\$0.01125 \text{ per year}\). The connection suggests fish waste effectively replaces externally purchased fertilizer. Fish production grows quickly in early years but the yearly increase slows after year 3 (from +1500/year to +500/year), indicating the system is maturing. Overall, the closed nutrient cycle increases profits by reducing outside costs and providing an additional product to sell.
The average amount by which the cost of fertilizer per 10 kg of apples sold decreased from year 1 to year 5 is, to the nearest power of 10, nearest to _____ dollars per 10 kg apples per year.
What is needed: The average yearly decrease in fertilizer cost per 10 kg apples, expressed as a single power of 10.
After year 3, the rate of growth in the total number of fish sold per year was _____
What is needed: Whether the annual increases in the number of fish sold after year 3 are getting larger, smaller, or staying about the same.
To solve these blanks, we looked at the trend data on the chart for both fertilizer cost and number of fish sold. For the first blank, we calculated the average annual decrease (\(\$0.01125\)) and rounded to the nearest power of 10, which is 0.01. For the second blank, we saw the annual increase in fish sold dropped from 1000 to 500 after year 3, so the answer is Decreasing. Both require extraction and comparison of values rather than complicated calculations.
Question 1 concerns the fertilizer cost trend while Question 2 concerns the trend in fish sales. Each is about a different quantity, requiring different information, so the blanks are independent and can be solved separately.