e-GMAT Logo
NEUR
N

Agro Enterprises currently uses an antiquated database system. Upgrading to a standard contemporary system would cost a moderate amount, whereas...

GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions

Source: Mock
Two Part Analysis
Verbal - RC
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Agro Enterprises currently uses an antiquated database system. Upgrading to a standard contemporary system would cost a moderate amount, whereas upgrading to an innovative, cutting-edge system would cost much more. A standard contemporary system is sufficiently energy-efficient that it would pay for itself in 10 years, but no sooner, as compared to the cost of keeping the current system. The annual savings in operational costs offered by the innovative system would cause such a system to pay for its purchase and installation in 5 years, but it would be no more energy-efficient than the current system. Or the company could just keep the current system. Any of the three systems would be able to function for the next 20 years.

Select Standard contemporary system for the option that the passage most strongly suggests is true of the standard contemporary system, and select Innovative, cutting-edge system for the option that the passage most strongly suggests is true of the innovative cutting-edge system. Make only two selections, one in each column.

Standard contemporary system
Innovative, cutting-edge system

Costs Agro the greatest total amount of money during 11 years of operation

Less energy-efficient than either of the other two database systems

The most energy-efficient of the three database systems

Costs Agro, on average, less per year to operate than either of the other systems

Costs Agro, on average, more per year to operate than either of the other systems

Solution

Phase 1: Owning the Dataset

Argument Analysis Table

Passage Statement Analysis & Implications
"A standard contemporary system is sufficiently energy-efficient that it would pay for itself in 10 years, but no sooner"
  • Core Fact: Standard system saves money through energy efficiency
  • Visualization: If upgrade costs $10,000, it saves $1,000/year in energy costs vs current system
  • Logical Connections: Must be more energy-efficient than current system
  • What We Can Conclude: Standard system has better energy efficiency than current
"The annual savings in operational costs offered by the innovative system would cause such a system to pay for its purchase and installation in 5 years"
  • Core Fact: Innovative system saves on operational costs
  • Visualization: If upgrade costs $20,000, it saves $4,000/year in operational costs
  • Logical Connections: Has significantly lower operational costs than current
  • What We Can Conclude: Innovative system operates more cheaply annually
"[Innovative system] would be no more energy-efficient than the current system"
  • Core Fact: Innovative system \(\leq\) current system in energy efficiency
  • Visualization: Uses same or more energy than current system
  • Logical Connections: Since standard \(>\) current, then standard \(>\) innovative
  • What We Can Conclude: Standard system is most energy-efficient of all three
"Upgrading to an innovative, cutting-edge system would cost much more"
  • Core Fact: Innovative system has highest upfront cost
  • Visualization: Innovative cost \(\gg\) Standard cost \(>\) $0
  • Logical Connections: Despite high cost, pays for itself fastest (5 years)
  • What We Can Conclude: Must have substantial operational savings to offset high cost

Key Patterns Identified

  • Energy Efficiency Ranking: \(\mathrm{Standard} > \mathrm{Current} \geq \mathrm{Innovative}\)
  • Operational Cost Ranking: \(\mathrm{Innovative} < \mathrm{Standard} < \mathrm{Current}\)
  • Payback Periods: Innovative (5 years) \(<\) Standard (10 years)

Phase 2: Question Analysis & Prethinking

Understanding Each Part

  • Part 1 (Standard System): What must be true about the standard contemporary system?
  • Part 2 (Innovative System): What must be true about the innovative cutting-edge system?
  • Relationship: Each system has distinct characteristics that we can infer from the facts

Valid Inferences Generated

For Standard System:

  1. It's the most energy-efficient of the three systems (since it's more efficient than current, and innovative is not more efficient than current)
  2. It has lower operational costs than the current system but higher than the innovative system

For Innovative System:

  1. It has the lowest operational costs per year (must save significantly to pay for high cost in just 5 years)
  2. It's not more energy-efficient than the current system

Phase 3: Answer Choice Evaluation

Analyzing Each Option:

"Costs Agro the greatest total amount of money during 11 years of operation"

  • This would require calculating total costs including purchase price
  • Not directly inferable from given facts
  • Cannot determine without specific numbers

"Less energy-efficient than either of the other two database systems"

  • For innovative system: We know it's not more efficient than current, and standard is more efficient than current
  • So innovative is less efficient than standard, but may equal current
  • Not definitively true for either system

"The most energy-efficient of the three database systems"

  • For standard system: YES! It's more efficient than current, and innovative is no more efficient than current
  • This must be true for the standard system

"Costs Agro, on average, less per year to operate than either of the other systems"

  • For innovative system: YES! It must have lowest operational costs to pay for its much higher price in just 5 years
  • The math requires this to be true

"Costs Agro, on average, more per year to operate than either of the other systems"

  • This contradicts the payback information for both systems
  • Neither system would pay for itself if it cost more to operate

Final Answer Selection

Standard Contemporary System: "The most energy-efficient of the three database systems"

  • Definitively supported by the facts
  • Standard is more efficient than current, innovative is not more efficient than current

Innovative, Cutting-edge System: "Costs Agro, on average, less per year to operate than either of the other systems"

  • Must be true given it pays for its much higher cost in only 5 years
  • Requires the greatest operational savings
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.