Loading...
A survey of \(\mathrm{110}\) people revealed that \(\mathrm{65}\) of those surveyed own stocks and \(\mathrm{82}\) of those surveyed own bonds. How many of the people surveyed own stocks but do not own bonds?
Let's break down what we're looking for. We have 110 people surveyed about their stock and bond ownership, and we need to find the exact number who own stocks but NOT bonds.
The specific number of people in the "stocks only" group.
Picture this as a Venn diagram problem with two overlapping circles—one for stock owners and one for bond owners. The 65 stock owners include both those who own only stocks AND those who own both stocks and bonds. To find the "stocks only" group, we need to know how many people are in the overlap (own both), then subtract that from 65.
The critical question: Can we determine how many people own BOTH stocks and bonds?
Statement 1 tells us: 50 of the people surveyed own both stocks and bonds.
This directly gives us the overlap! Now we can calculate:
[STOP - Statement 1 is SUFFICIENT!]
We can definitively answer that 15 people own stocks but not bonds.
This eliminates choices B, C, and E.
Now let's forget Statement 1 completely and analyze Statement 2 independently.
Statement 2 tells us: 13 of the people surveyed do not own either stocks or bonds.
This means that \(110 - 13 = 97\) people own at least one type of investment (stocks, bonds, or both).
Here's where the "slot-filling" logic reveals the answer. Think of it this way:
But wait—we only have 97 people to fill 147 slots!
The difference of \(147 - 97 = 50\) represents the people who are "double-counted" because they fill a slot in BOTH circles. These are the people who own both stocks and bonds.
Now we can calculate: Stock owners who don't own bonds = \(65 - 50 = 15\)
[STOP - Statement 2 is also SUFFICIENT!]
Statement 2 alone allows us to determine the answer.
Both statements independently tell us that exactly 15 people own stocks but not bonds.
Answer Choice D: "Each statement alone is sufficient."
Both paths arrive at the same definitive answer, confirming that each statement is sufficient on its own.