Loading...
A restaurant asked a focus group to rate 5 new dishes, each of which features either beef, chicken, fish, pork, or tofu. The focus group was asked to make a comparison of each pair of dishes and to choose which of the two dishes they preferred. The graphic shows the focus group's preferences. For example, when the focus group compared the dish featuring beef to the dish featuring chicken, their preference was the dish featuring chicken, and this is indicated at the intersection of the horizontal row containing the label beef on the far right and the vertical column containing the label chicken at the top.
From each drop-down menu, select the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
| Text Component | Literal Content | Simple Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Study setup | "A restaurant asked a focus group to rate 5 new dishes" | A restaurant invited people to judge 5 different new dishes |
| Dish types | "each of which features either beef, chicken, fish, pork, or tofu" | The dishes are based on beef, chicken, fish, pork, or tofu |
| Comparison method | "the focus group was asked to make a comparison of each pair of dishes and to choose which of the two dishes they preferred" | Participants compared every possible pair of dishes and chose their favorite in each matchup |
| Chart description | "the graphic shows the focus group's preferences" | The chart summarizes which dishes won in each comparison |
| Chart usage example | "when the focus group compared ... beef ... chicken ... their preference was ... chicken ... indicated at the intersection ... row containing ... beef ... and ... column containing ... chicken" | Find the intersection of a dish's row and another dish's column to see which dish was preferred in that matchup |
| Chart Component | What's Shown | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Chart type | Square matrix with dish names as labels (right and top) | Displays every pairwise comparison between the five dishes |
| Cell content | Name of preferred dish for each dish pair | Shows which dish won for every possible matchup |
| Triangular matrix | Only cells above or below diagonal are filled | Each comparison is only shown once: no redundant or duplicate entries |
| Visual pattern | Tofu appears as winner in all tofu comparisons; pork never appears as a winner | Tofu wins every matchup; pork loses all |
| Win counts | Tofu (4), Chicken (2), Fish (2), Beef (1), Pork (0) | Quantifies overall preferences among dishes |
Tofu is the clear favorite, winning every possible comparison and appearing as the preferred choice in every matchup it appears in. Pork is the least preferred, losing in every comparison and never being selected as the favorite in any pairing. Chicken and fish are equally preferred in the middle, while beef wins only one comparison. The clear preference order is: Tofu > Chicken = Fish > Beef > Pork.
The focus group preferred the dish featuring ______ to every other dish.
The focus group preferred every other dish to the dish featuring ______.
By reviewing the pairwise preference matrix, it's clear that tofu was selected over every other dish (winning every matchup), and pork was never selected as the winner (losing every matchup). Thus, tofu fills the first blank, and pork fills the second.
The two questions are independent; one asks for the universally preferred dish while the other asks for the universally least preferred. Each requires identifying a distinct pattern (all wins, or all losses) in the comparison matrix.