A dance show will include exactly five pieces: Requiem, Smooth Step, Trampoline, Unleashed, and Waltzy. Requiem will be presented immediately...
GMAT Two Part Analysis : (TPA) Questions
A dance show will include exactly five pieces: Requiem, Smooth Step, Trampoline, Unleashed, and Waltzy. Requiem will be presented immediately before Smooth Step. Unleashed will be presented earlier than Trampoline, with at least one piece in between. Waltzy will not be the final piece presented.
In the table, select a piece that cannot be the second piece presented and a piece that cannot be the third piece presented. Make only two selections, one in each column.
OWNING THE DATASET
Visual Representation
Positions: [1] - [2] - [3] - [4] - [5]
Pieces: Requiem (R), Smooth Step (S), Trampoline (T), Unleashed (U), Waltzy (W)
Constraints:
- \(\mathrm{R} \rightarrow \mathrm{S}\) (R immediately before S, must be consecutive)
- \(\mathrm{U} \ldots \mathrm{T}\) (U before T with at least one piece between)
- \(\mathrm{W} \neq \text{position 5}\) (W cannot be final)
Immediate Inferences
- RS forms a fixed block that moves together
- U and T cannot be adjacent
- T cannot appear before U
- W can only occupy positions 1-4
UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTION
Task: Find which piece CANNOT be second and which CANNOT be third
Answer choices: All five pieces are options for both columns
PROCESSING THE SOLUTION
Critical Insight
The key is recognizing how the spacing constraint between U and T interacts with position limitations.
Testing Position 2
Can Trampoline be second?
If T is in position 2:
- U must be before T with at least one piece between
- U cannot be in position 1 (no space for a piece between U and T)
- VIOLATION: No valid position for U
Conclusion: T CANNOT be second
Quick verification of others:
- R in position 2 → S in position 3 ✓
- S in position 2 → R in position 1 ✓
- U in position 2 → T can be 4 or 5 with space ✓
- W in position 2 → No constraints violated ✓
Testing Position 3
Can Waltzy be third?
If W is in position 3:
- Positions 1, 2, 4, 5 must contain R, S, U, T
- RS must be consecutive → either positions (1,2) or (4,5)
Case 1: RS occupy positions 1,2
- U and T must occupy positions 4,5
- Since U before T: \(\mathrm{U}=4, \mathrm{T}=5\)
- VIOLATION: No piece between U and T
Case 2: RS occupy positions 4,5
- U and T must occupy positions 1,2
- Since U before T: \(\mathrm{U}=1, \mathrm{T}=2\)
- VIOLATION: No piece between U and T
Conclusion: W CANNOT be third
Quick verification of others:
- R in position 3 → \(\mathrm{S}=4\), can place \(\mathrm{U}=1, \mathrm{W}=2, \mathrm{T}=5\) ✓
- S in position 3 → \(\mathrm{R}=2\), can place \(\mathrm{U}=1, \mathrm{W}=4, \mathrm{T}=5\) ✓
- T in position 3 → \(\mathrm{U}=1\), can place \(\mathrm{W}=2, \mathrm{RS}=4,5\) ✓
- U in position 3 → can place \(\mathrm{RS}=1,2, \mathrm{W}=4, \mathrm{T}=5\) ✓
FINAL SOLUTION SYNTHESIS
Solution Path Recap
- Identified that RS forms a moveable block
- Recognized U-T spacing constraint as the key limiting factor
- For position 2: T cannot have U placed validly before it
- For position 3: W forces impossible adjacent placement of U and T
Final Answer
- Cannot be presented second: Trampoline
- Cannot be presented third: Waltzy
Key Insights
- The spacing constraint between U and T is the most restrictive condition
- When a piece occupies a middle position, check if remaining pieces can satisfy all constraints
- Adjacent-piece constraints (like RS) combined with spacing constraints create impossible scenarios
Exam Strategy
- Start with the most constrained pieces (here, U and T)
- Test extreme positions first (positions that limit placement options)
- Use logical elimination rather than testing all permutations