A certain electric utility is considering exactly two designs (Designs 1 and 2) for a new power generation plant. Each...

GMAT Multi Source Reasoning : (MSR) Questions

Source: Mock

Multi Source Reasoning

Case Study

EASY

...

Notes

Post a Query

Designs

Pollutants by Phase

A certain electric utility is considering exactly two designs (Designs 1 and 2) for a new power generation plant. Each design would result in a plant that would generate the same amount of power annually; but Design 1 would use a single Type A power generator, whereas Design 2 would use three Type B power generators.

Type A generators cost less than Type B generators to fuel per unit of power generated and vent through taller chimneys, which better prevent pollutants from concentrating near the plant. However, Type A generators produce solid waste that is difficult and expensive to dispose of safely.

Type B generators produce no solid waste and, as compared to Type A generators, vent approximately half as much Pollutant X, and even less Pollutant Y, per unit of power generated annually. However, Type B generators vent through much shorter chimneys.

Ques. 1/3

Suppose that the utility chooses Design 1 over Design 2. For each of the following motivations, select Yes if the information in the tabs suggests that it would help explain this choice. Otherwise, select No

Yes

A desire to use the type of generator that costs less to fuel per unit of power generated

Yes

A desire to avoid having to dispose of solid waste

Yes

A desire to emit less Pollutant X per unit of power generated annually

Solution

OWNING THE DATASET

Understanding Source A: Text Document - Electric Utility Power Plant Design Options

Information from Dataset	Analysis
""A certain electric utility is considering exactly two designs (Designs 1 and 2) for a new power generation plant. Each design would result in a plant that would generate the same amount of power annually""	The utility must choose between only two options Both designs will produce the same amount of electricity Inference: This is a decision-making scenario where the utility needs to weigh pros and cons
""Design 1 would use a single Type A power generator, whereas Design 2 would use three Type B power generators""	Design 1 = 1 Type A generator Design 2 = 3 Type B generators Inference: A single Type A generator must have higher capacity than a Type B generator (since it takes 3 Type Bs to equal 1 Type A)
""Type A generators cost less than Type B generators to fuel per unit of power generated and vent through taller chimneys, which better prevent pollutants from concentrating near the plant""	Type A advantages: Lower fuel costs and better pollutant dispersion Taller chimneys = better for spreading out pollution Inference: Ground-level pollution concentration is a major concern for this utility
""Type A generators produce solid waste that is difficult and expensive to dispose of safely""	Type A disadvantage: Problematic solid waste Inference: Solid waste disposal is a significant environmental and cost concern Inference: Safety concerns exist with Type A's waste products
""Type B generators produce no solid waste and, as compared to Type A generators, vent approximately half as much Pollutant X, and even less Pollutant Y, per unit of power generated annually""	Type B advantages: No solid waste, lower air emissions Type B emits ~(mathrm{50\%}) of Type A's Pollutant X Type B emits less than (mathrm{50\%}) of Type A's Pollutant Y Inference: Environmental emissions vary by pollutant type
""Type B generators vent through much shorter chimneys""	Type B disadvantage: Shorter chimneys Inference: Type B's shorter chimneys may concentrate pollutants near ground level, partially offsetting its lower emission rates

Summary: This document outlines a choice between two power plant designs with clear tradeoffs
Design 1 (one Type A generator) offers lower fuel costs but produces problematic solid waste
Design 2 (three Type B generators) avoids solid waste and has lower emissions but may concentrate pollutants due to shorter chimneys

Understanding Source B: Table with Text - Pollutant Y Emissions During Different Operational Phases

Information from Dataset	Analysis
""Both Type A and Type B generators emit (vent) significantly more of Pollutant Y during the startup phase—when a generator is brought to its normal power-generating phase from nonoperation""	Startup = transition from off to normal operation Both generator types emit more during startup Inference: Startup emissions are temporary but significant Linkage to Source A: Source A didn't mention different operational phases - this adds complexity to the environmental comparison
""During startup, unhealthy levels of Pollutant Y can become concentrated at ground level near the power plant""	Startup creates health risks nearby Inference: Ground-level concentration is the primary concern Linkage to Source A: This confirms why Source A emphasized chimney height and ground-level concentration

Table Data Analysis

Generator Type	Operation Phase	Emissions (kg/hr)	Ground-level Concentration Increase (mcg/m³)
Type A	Startup	(mathrm{744})	(mathrm{61})
Type A	Normal	(mathrm{218})	(mathrm{13})
Type B	Startup	(mathrm{203})	(mathrm{47})
Type B	Normal	(mathrm{6})	(mathrm{3})

Key Patterns

Type A startup emissions are (mathrm{3.4 imes}) higher than normal ((mathrm{744}) vs (mathrm{218}) kg/hr)
Type B startup emissions are (mathrm{33.8 imes}) higher than normal ((mathrm{203}) vs (mathrm{6}) kg/hr)
Type B's normal emissions are only (mathrm{2.8\%}) of Type A's ((mathrm{6}) vs (mathrm{218}) kg/hr)
Key Finding: Type B is dramatically cleaner during normal operation
Linkage to Source A: Despite Type B's much lower emissions ((mathrm{203}) vs (mathrm{744}) kg/hr during startup), its ground-level concentration is still (mathrm{77\%}) of Type A's - shorter chimneys explain this
Linkage to Source A: This quantifies Source A's claim that Type B emits ""even less Pollutant Y"" - it's actually (mathrm{97\%}) less during normal operation!
Linkage to Source A: The concentration data proves why chimney height matters - Type B's shorter chimneys partially offset its emission advantages

Summary: Source B reveals that both generator types emit much more Pollutant Y during startup, with Type A producing significantly higher emissions overall
However, Type B's shorter chimneys mean its ground-level impact is still substantial despite lower emissions
This confirms the chimney height tradeoff mentioned in Source A

Understanding Source C: [No Source Provided]

No Source C content was provided for analysis
Summary: Only two sources were provided for this dataset analysis

Overall Summary

The combined sources reveal a complex environmental tradeoff between two power plant designs
Design 1 (one Type A generator):
- Lower fuel costs
- Produces difficult-to-dispose solid waste
- Emits (mathrm{218}) kg/hr of Pollutant Y during normal operation
- Emits (mathrm{744}) kg/hr during startup
Design 2 (three Type B generators):
- Avoids solid waste entirely
- Produces dramatically lower air emissions - only (mathrm{18}) kg/hr total during normal operation
- Emits (mathrm{609}) kg/hr during startup for all three units
- Type B's shorter chimneys partially offset emission advantages by concentrating pollutants near ground level
The environmental comparison is more nuanced than simple emission totals would suggest

Question Analysis

Connecting to Our Passage Analysis

In plain terms: If the utility picks Design 1 (one Type A generator) instead of Design 2 (three Type B generators), would each given reason make sense for that choice?
Key constraints:
- Evaluate three specific motivations
- Answer Yes if the motivation explains choosing Design 1
- Answer No if the motivation does not explain choosing Design 1
Answer type needed: Comparative evaluation of design characteristics
Can answer from analysis: Yes - all three characteristics are explicitly covered in the cross-source analysis

Detailed Evaluation

Statement 1 Evaluation (Fuel Costs)

Question: Would wanting cheaper fuel costs explain choosing Design 1?
Type A costs less to fuel per unit of power
Design 1 uses Type A
Type A's lower fuel costs align with choosing Design 1
YES - Lower fuel costs support Design 1 choice

Statement 2 Evaluation (Solid Waste)

Question: Would wanting to avoid solid waste disposal explain choosing Design 1?
Type A produces difficult/expensive solid waste, Type B produces none
Design 1 uses Type A
Type A's solid waste contradicts avoiding waste disposal
NO - Avoiding solid waste would favor Design 2, not Design 1

Statement 3 Evaluation (Pollutant X)

Question: Would wanting to emit less Pollutant X explain choosing Design 1?
Type B emits approximately half as much Pollutant X as Type A
Design 1 uses Type A
Type A's higher Pollutant X emissions contradict this motivation
NO - Lower Pollutant X emissions would favor Design 2, not Design 1

Verification

Source A explicitly states Type A costs less to fuel - confirms YES for statement 1
Source A clearly indicates Type A produces solid waste while Type B doesn't - confirms NO for statement 2
Source A specifies Type B vents about half the Pollutant X of Type A - confirms NO for statement 3

Final Answer

1: Yes
2: No
3: No

Answer Choices Explained

Yes

A desire to use the type of generator that costs less to fuel per unit of power generated

Yes

A desire to avoid having to dispose of solid waste

Yes

A desire to emit less Pollutant X per unit of power generated annually

Rate this Solution

Tell us what you think about this solution

...

Forum Discussions

Start a new discussion

Post

Previous Attempts

Loading attempts...